The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
“The whole appearance of the rotten vegetables we observed, perfectly
resembles, according to the remark of Sir Joseph Banks, the moor
which, in Blakeney Fen, and in other parts of the East Fen in
Lincolnshire, is thrown up in the making of banks; barks like those
of the birch-tree being there also abundantly found. The moor
extends over all the Lincolnshire fens, and has been traced as far as
Peterborough, more than sixty miles to the south of Sutton. On the
north side, according to the fishermen, the moory islets extend as
far as Grimsby, situated on the south side of the Humber: and it is a
remarkable circumstance, that in the large tracts of low land which
lie on the south banks of that river, a little above its mouth, there
is a subterraneous stratum of decayed trees and shrubs, exactly like
those we have observed at Sutton; particularly at Axolme isle, a
tract of ten miles in length by five in breadth; and at Hatfield
chace, which comprehends 180,000 acres. Dugdale had long ago made
this observation in the first of these places; and Dela Prime in the
second. The roots are there likewise standing in the places where
they grew: the trunks lie prostrate. The woods are of the same
species as at Sutton. Roots of aquatic plants and reeds are likewise
mixed with them; and they are covered by a stratum of some yards of
soil, the thickness of which, though not ascertained with exactness
by the abovementioned observers, we may easily conceive to correspond
with what covers the stratum of decayed wood at Sutton, by the
circumstances of the roots being (according to Mr. Richardson’s
observations) only visible when the water is low, where a channel was
cut which has left them uncovered.
“Little doubt can be entertained of the moory islets of Sutton being
a part of this extensive and subterraneous stratum, which, by some
inroad of the sea, has there been stripped of its covering of soil.
The identity of the levels; that of the species of trees; the roots
of these affixed in both to the soil where they grew; and above all,
the flattened shape of the trunks, branches, and roots, found in the
islets (which can only be accounted for by the heavy pressure of a
superinduced stratum) are sufficient reasons for this opinion.”
SECTION III.
_Further observations from the same Paper—Epoch of the destruction of the
said Forest—Agency by which it was effected_, _&c.—Similar appearances
eastward along the Norfolk coast_.
“Such a wide-spread assemblage of vegetable ruins, lying almost in
the same level, and that level generally under the common mark of low
water, must naturally strike the observer, and give birth to the
following questions: 1. What is the epoch of this destruction? 2. By
what agency was it effected?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account