The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
A statute had been passed on the 8th July 1536, declaring Elizabeth
base-born,[205] and on Sunday, 30th August, Mary was proclaimed
heiress-apparent in one of the London churches. When the Yorkshire men
rose, on the 9th October, they swore to be true “to the King’s lawful
issue and the noble blood”. Robert Aske, leader of the insurgents, was
declared Grand Captain of the Commons of Yorkshire. He could rely on
the staunch loyalty of 30,000 “tall men and well horsed,” as well as on
the enthusiastic adherence of the whole population, while the King’s
forces, under the Duke of Norfolk, only amounted to 6,000 men, hampered
in their every movement northwards by the disaffection of the midland
and eastern counties. Had all these advantages been husbanded by the
rebels, they might have dictated terms to Henry; but the strongest arm
is powerless against a subtle brain, and Cromwell soon perceived that
his one chance lay in negotiation. The word meant with him stratagem
and fraud. The promise of a free pardon, and a Parliament at York was
so worded, that it was understood by all the leaders of the rising
to mean consent to their demands. They disbanded their troops, and
by degrees order was restored. Then, all the northern towns were
strongly garrisoned by the King, and the last palpitating throes of the
rebellion were eagerly seized upon as a pretext for withdrawing every
concession that had been made. The Lords Dacre and Hussey were arrested
and sent to the block. The Earl of Northumberland and Sir Robert
Constable, with the Abbots of Barlings, of Fountains and of Jervaulx,
were hanged in chains. Lady Bulmer, for encouraging the rebels, was
burned at the stake. A letter from Henry to his lieutenant in the north
gave him _carte blanche_ for every atrocity. The King wrote:—
“We approve of your proceeding in the displaying of your banner, which,
being now spread, till it is closed again, the course of our laws must
give place to martial law; and before you close it up again, you must
cause such dreadful execution upon a good number of the inhabitants,
hanging them on trees, quartering them and setting their heads and
quarters in every town, as shall be a fearful warning, whereby shall
ensue the preservation of a great multitude.”[206]
It is noticeable that the King does not here speak of the execution of
the leaders, but of “a good number of the inhabitants,” an order which
resulted in the most fearful carnage. The Duke of Norfolk, anxious to
prove his loyalty, declared that his only regret was that there were
not enough iron chains in the country in which to hang the prisoners;
ropes must serve for some. But he flattered himself that so great a
number put to death at one time had never yet been heard of.[207] “It
was,” says one writer, “as if the earth had broken out into gibbets,
but in spite of them the people, though coerced, were not cowed.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account