The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Lord Dacre, speaking before the Council, had a tongue as free as when
he led his Yorkshire yokels to battle. “It is thou,” he said boldly,
confronting Cromwell, “that art the very special and chief cause of
all this rebellion and wickedness, and dost daily travail to bring us
to our ends and strike off our heads. I trust that ere thou diest,
though thou wouldst procure all the noblest heads within the realm to
be stricken off, yet there shall one head remain that shall strike off
thy head.” After the pardon at Doncaster, three hundred persons wished
to pull the curate out of the pulpit at Kendal Church, crying out: “He
shall proclaim the Pope to be supreme head of the Church, or be cast
into the water!”[208]
But in spite of the anxieties caused by the rebellion, the perennial
subject of the disposal of Mary’s hand in marriage was occupying
public attention both at home and abroad. It kept the possibility of
an alliance with Henry perpetually before the arbiters of European
affairs, and did more to avert war than all his other tactics. But it
is clear, with the whole history of his negotiations before us, that he
never intended Mary to leave the country, and risk her repudiation of
all that he had been at so great pains to wring from her.
Already, in February 1536, the Emperor had devised a marriage between
his cousin Mary, and Don Loys, brother of King Emanuel of Portugal,
his brother-in-law. Henry appeared to look favourably on the proposed
match, and in June, a formal demand was made for her hand. The matter
was allowed to drag on indefinitely; raised from time to time with
much affectation of seriousness, to suit Henry’s policy, it was again
repeatedly dropped, for the nice adjustment of the scale, when Francis
became restive, at the apparent understanding between his ally and
his enemy. Then the proposed union of the Princess Mary with the Duke
of Orleans was once more brought forward, and so the changes rang for
some time. But all this was merely on the surface; and the question of
Mary’s legitimacy was the only real point at issue, for it involved the
whole series of events which had landed Henry in his actual position
with regard to his own subjects, to his fellow-sovereigns, and to the
Pope, still a power to be reckoned with. To yield that point was to
give up all he had been fighting for during the last ten years, and to
cut away the ground from under his feet. If he temporised long enough,
the possible birth of a son might allow him to restore his daughter
without loss of his own dignity.
Charles V., in putting forward Don Loys as a suitor, made the
condition, that the slur cast by Henry on Mary’s birth should be
removed; and Henry’s instructions to his special envoy, Sir Thomas
Wyatt, on the renewal of his amity with the Emperor, show the use her
father intended to make of her renunciation of her birthright.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account