The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
“Pleaseth your Lordship so it is that there was a coat armour found in
the Duchess of Salisbury’s coffer, and by the one side of the coat,
there was the King’s grace his arms of England, that is the lions
without the _fleur de lys_, and about the whole arms was made pansies
for Pole, and marygolds for my Lady Mary. This was about the coat
armour. And betwixt the marygold and the pansy was made a tree to rise
in the midst, and on the tree a coat of purple hanging on a bough, in
token of the coat of Christ, and on the other side of the coat all
the Passion of Christ. Pole intended to have married my lady Mary,
and betwixt them both should again arise the old doctrine of Christ.
This was the intent that the coat was made, as it is openly known in
the Parliament house, as Master Sir George Speke showed me. And this
my lady Marquess, my lady Salisbury, Sir Adrian Forskew [Fortescue],
Sir Thomas Dingley with divers others are attainted to die by act of
Parliament.”[230]
Pole thus wrote of his mother’s arrest to Cardinal Contarini:—
“You have heard, I believe of my mother being condemned by public
council to death, or rather to eternal life. Not only has he who
condemned her, condemned to death a woman of seventy, than whom he has
no nearer relation except his daughter, and of whom he used to say
there was no holier woman in his kingdom, but at the same time, her
grandson, son of my brother, a child, the remaining hope of our race.
See how far this tyranny has gone, which began with priests, in whose
order it only consumed the best, then [went on] to nobles, and there
too destroyed the best. At length it has come to women and innocent
children; for not only my mother is condemned, but the wife of that
marquis [of Exeter] who was slain with my brother, whose goodness was
famous and whose little son is to follow her. Comparing these things
with what the Turk has done in the East, there is no doubt but that
Christians can suffer worse under this western Turk.”[231]
In Cromwell’s _Remembrances_ occurs this entry: “What the King will
have done with the Lady of Salisbury”.[232] It was his pleasure that
she should languish in prison for two years, before her grey head was
brought to the scaffold, but her son, Lord Montague, had suffered no
such delay. Together with Courtenay, Marquis of Exeter he had been
arrested, the latter for no other crime than for saying, “Knaves rule
about the King,” and that he trusted “to give them a buffet some day,”
and together they were beheaded on Tower Hill. Courtenay’s young son
Edward, mentioned in Pole’s letter, remained in the Tower, grew up
there, and was liberated by Mary in person on her accession.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account