The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Chapuys describes Lady Salisbury’s execution in the Tower, in presence
of the Lord Mayor and about 150 persons. He says that when informed of
her sentence she found it very strange, not knowing her crime; but she
walked to the space in front of the Tower where there was no scaffold,
but only a small block, and there commended her soul to God. She
desired those present to pray for the King, Queen, Prince and Princess.
The ordinary executioner being absent, a “blundering garçonneau”
performed the office, who hacked her head and shoulders to pieces.[233]
There is no trace in the public records of the immediate effect
produced on Mary by these frightful occurrences, except that Chapuys
reports to the Emperor that “the Princess has been very ill, and in
some danger of her life, but thanks to God she is beginning to recover,
and there is a hope that owing to the good diet prescribed by her
physicians, and the great care her father, and her own servants take of
her, she will soon recover completely”.
She knew by experience, how slight a remark would suffice to place
her own head in jeopardy, and acutely as she would feel the awful fate
of her best friends, especially that of one to whom she owed next to
her mother all her early training in that “virtue and goodness” of
which even her father was proud, she dared not give utterance to the
least word of sorrow, or even show a mournful countenance lest she
should excite his wrath. When the strain became too great, the nervous
tension ended in a complete break-down that must have been a relief.
When we consider that even thoughts, sympathies and friendships were
interpreted high-treason by this “western Turk,” and that Mary’s mental
attitude was well-known to him, her hair-breadth escapes partake of
the marvellous. In spite of her yielding to his every demand, he knew
full well that his daughter had never given an interior consent to his
new laws, and that in the eyes of Europe, he was on account of those
same laws an object of derision. The only way in which he could claim
respect for himself and for them was by becoming a terror. There is no
doubt that Mary was still of value to him in playing off one of his
allies against another, but at any moment it might suit his policy
better to behead her, than to pretend to dispose of her in marriage.
Cromwell, it is true, seemed to be her friend, but in the past, he had
been the origin of her troubles, and it was evident to all, that his
friendship would be as chaff before the wind, if she stood between him
and the attainment of his purpose. It has been more than once pointed
out by biographers of Cromwell, that he was not unnecessarily cruel,
that he never sent any to the block from private passion, that he took
no delight in bloodshed for its own sake. Neither was he accessible to
any feeling of generosity or pity. All the thews and sinews of his make
were of iron; humanity he esteemed a weakness, and altogether beside
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account