The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Those bishops who resisted the new laws were sent to the Tower,
among them were Heath, Day and Gardiner, who denounced as illegal
all ecclesiastical changes made during the King’s minority. Cranmer
had long since joined the Protestant party, and it was observed in
1549 that “this year the Archbishop of Canterbury did eat meat openly
in Lent in the hall of Lambeth, the like of which was never seen
since England was a christian country”. But the proceedings of the
Council were marked by singular inconsistency, for although most of
the changes tended towards a shaking off of old beliefs, freedom of
conscience was by no means allowed. The statute _De Heresia_ was
again called into play, and a woman was tried, condemned and burned
for denying the Incarnation of our Lord. On the 2nd May 1549, Edward
wrote in his Diary, “Joan Bocher, otherwise called Joan of Kent, was
burnt for holding that Christ was not incarnate of the Virgin Mary,
being condemned the year before, but kept in hope of conversion, and
the 30 of April, the bishop of London, and the bishop of Ely were to
persuade her. But she withstood them, and reviled the preacher that
preached at her death.” The three bishops, Hooper, Latimer and Ridley
followed Cranmer’s lead, and distinguished themselves in the cause of
the Reformation.[265] But the people rose in protest, a revolt that
was everywhere stamped out in blood. Cranmer’s _Book of Common Prayer_
superseded the Missal and Breviary, and an order of the Privy Council
provided that from thenceforth, “no printer should print or put into
vent any English book but such as should first be examined by Mr.
Secretary Petre, Mr. Secretary Smith, and Mr. Cecil, or the one of
them, and allowed by the same, under pain of imprisonment”.[266]
The triumph of the Reformation all along the line was celebrated by
the pardon and release of Somerset, on his subscribing a document
consisting of twenty-nine charges brought against him, in which he was
made to confess his presumption, negligence and incapacity.
During this time, Mary was living, for the most part, in great
retirement, at her favourite residence, Beaulieu (New Hall) in Essex,
rarely appearing at court, and hoping that by attracting little
attention she might be able to practise her religion unmolested. The
Mass, although abolished by Act of Parliament, and celebrated only at
the risk of pains and penalties, was still said openly in her house.
The Statute of Uniformity by which heavy penalties were inflicted on
all priests saying Mass, and on every individual who should be found
present at Mass, was a formidable weapon in Somerset’s hands. The
Protector summoned Mary, in his capacity as head of the Council, to
embrace the new form of worship. Her answer was a spirited protest:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account