The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Each one was ordered on his allegiance, to inform the Council if this
command were disobeyed, and when after some time, the commissioners
were waiting outside the house for one of the chaplains who had not
been present when the charge was given, they go on to say that, “the
Lady Mary’s Grace sent to us to speak with her one word at a window.
When we were come into the court, notwithstanding that we offered to
come up to her chamber, she would needs speak out of the window, and
prayed us to speak to the Lords of the Council, that her comptroller
might shortly return, for said she sythens his departing I take the
account myself of my expenses, and learn how many loaves of bread be
made of a bushel of wheat, and ye wis my father and my mother never
brought me up with baking and brewing, and to be plain with you, I am
weary of mine office, and therefore, if my Lords will send my officer
home, they shall do me pleasure, otherwise if they will send him to
prison, I beshrew him if he go not to it merrily, and with a good-will.
And I pray God to send you to do well in your souls and bodies too, for
some of you have but weak bodies.”[281]
Instead of granting this last request, the Council committed the three
officers, Rochester, Waldegrave and Inglefield to the Tower, where
they remained till the 18th March 1552, and a month later, the same
Lords addressed letters to the Lady Mary’s Grace, that her servants
be sent unto her according to her desire. By that time, another wave
had swept over Mary’s destiny. For some reason that has never been
apparent, the King’s counsellors changed their tactics, and the
Princess was henceforth allowed to practise her religion in peace.
Edward’s health was rapidly declining, and the bold design of the Duke
of Northumberland to set aside her rights, and annul her father’s will,
had not yet been framed. It might, therefore, have been judged prudent,
somewhat to conciliate one who stood so near the throne, and who might
soon be called upon to mount it. Moreover, in 1550, Sir John Masone
informed the Council that the Emperor had serious thoughts of carrying
her off, and in 1551 we find that certain pinnaces were prepared for
her secret transport over sea.[282]
Perhaps both these considerations weighed with the Council, and the
fall of Somerset further turned the scale in her favour by ridding Mary
of her bitterest enemy. He was again arrested in December 1551, lodged
in the Tower, and tried for high treason. Acquitted of this charge, he
was condemned for felony, and executed within six weeks. The fact is
notified in Edward’s Journal in the words: “The Duke of Somerset had
his head cut off upon Tower hill, between eight and nine o’clock in the
morning” (22nd January 1552).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account