The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Although the Puritans had set the fashion of sober colours and rigid
simplicity of dress, which was followed by most people during Edward’s
reign, the Princess and her friends continued to assume a considerable
amount of state in their retinue and attire. Strype[285] records
that on her going to court in 1550, Mary rode through London with
fifty knights and gentlemen in velvet coats and chains of gold before
her, while following her were fourscore gentlemen and ladies. On her
arrival, the Comptroller of the King’s Household received her, and
many lords and knights escorted her through the hall to the presence
chamber, where she remained two hours “being treated at a goodly
banquet”. But when she visited the King at Greenwich in 1552, it was
observed that her company was only half the number which a nobleman
chose to come with a week afterwards.[286]
Edward had always been a delicate boy, and his weak constitution was
still further debilitated in 1552, by a combination of diseases, so
that even the most hopeful began to fear the worst. Nothing was however
done to alter the succession till the spring of the following year.
In May, took place the marriage of Lord Guildford Dudley, fourth son
of the Duke of Northumberland, to the Lady Jane Grey, granddaughter
of Henry VIII.’s sister Mary, who, first married to the King of
France, became afterwards the wife of Brandon, Duke of Suffolk. This
marriage of his son to one so nearly related to the royal family was
Northumberland’s first step in what Turner calls “that nefarious
combination,” by which the Crown was to be alienated from its rightful
possessor, and placed on the head of a usurper. The injustice of the
proceeding was threefold: 1. Henry VIII. had determined the succession
by virtue of a statute of the realm, and it could not legally be set
aside. 2. In the event of the failure of both his daughters, the
next in succession would have been Mary Stuart, but Northumberland
passed her over with the inconsistent pretext, that Henry had excluded
the issue of his elder sister, Margaret, from his will. 3. The Lady
Frances, daughter of the Duchess of Suffolk, married to Henry, Lord
Grey, created Duke of Suffolk, was also set aside, in favour of her
eldest daughter, the better to satisfy Northumberland’s ambition by
marrying this young lady to his son. On the 25th June Edward was so ill
that it was reported he was dead, and one of his physicians told the
French ambassador that he could not get beyond the month of August. He
died on the 6th July, having been persuaded to exclude both his sisters
from the succession, in defiance of his father’s will, and to leave the
Crown to the Lady Jane Grey.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 252: Harl. MS. 5087, art. vi., Brit. Mus. Ellis’s _Letters_,
ii., 134, 1st series.]
[Footnote 253: _Letters of the Kings of England_, vol. ii., p. 8,
edited by J. O. Halliwell.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account