The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Northumberland was, justly enough, the scapegoat; but as he had said,
no member of the Council came out of the matter with clean hands. All
had signed the will which the Duke had dictated to Edward, enfeebled
by his mortal disease, and dexterously worked up to a pitch of
fanaticism that made him oblivious of justice. But Cecil’s proceedings
were, by his own showing, perhaps the most despicable. In his written
submission[308] to Queen Mary, after beseeching her clemency, he went
on to confess that his conduct throughout the plot had been guided by
the one consideration of saving his skin whole. He had shuffled as
long as he dared brave the Duke’s irritation, and had given in only,
when the odds in favour of the conspirators seemed overwhelming. But
when Northumberland had charged him to proclaim the Lady Jane, he
had shifted the responsibility of the act on to Throckmorton, “whose
conscience I saw was troubled therewith, misliking the matter”. The
document ends with the pious invocation:—
“_Justus adjutorium meus Dominus qui salvos facit rectos corde._ God
save the Queen in all felicity.
“W. CECILL.”
Sir William Petre had also tried to make compromises with the Duke, but
had succumbed, on being told that unless he agreed to the whole plan
he could no longer retain his office of Secretary of State. Each day
brought Mary fresh conquests. After a nine days’ rebellion, without
a single blow having been struck in her defence, she was proclaimed
Queen in every town in England. Her journey to London was a triumphal
progress. Antoine de Noailles, the French ambassador, who had so lately
conspired with Edward’s Council, and who was to be the evil genius of
the new reign, rode twenty-five miles into the country to meet and
congratulate the Queen in his master’s name, offering her the whole
of the French forces, in support of her right. At Wanstead, she was
joined by the Lady Elizabeth, who had prudently abstained from taking
sides, till it should be clear where success lay. She had declined
Northumberland’s overtures, and offers of large sums of money, but
had equally avoided moving a finger in Mary’s cause, pleading an
illness, which however allowed her to recover opportunely, when the
Queen was about to take possession of her capital. Mary greeted her
affectionately, embraced all her ladies, and assigned her the next
place in the royal cortège after herself.[309] Together they entered
the City of London at Aldgate, on the 3rd August, and rode through the
densely crowded streets, the multitude rending the air with shouts
of joy. Elizabeth was too clever not to estimate at its real value
the contrast presented by the two sisters on this striking occasion.
In spite of their loyalty and enthusiasm in realising the reward of
their long devotion, the people could not fail to observe, that the
Queen at thirty-seven, worn with trouble and sickness, was eclipsed by
Elizabeth’s twenty years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account