The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Elizabeth was tall and majestic, more gracious than beautiful, pale
of complexion, with fine eyes, and hands that were admired for their
whiteness and elegance. It was noticed that she knew how to use them
effectively.[310]
At the Tower, where according to custom, the Queen was to reside
pending her brother’s obsequies, the State prisoners of the two
preceding reigns were kneeling on the Green, in front of the scaffold.
These were the Duchess of Somerset, who had been in captivity since the
execution of her husband; the aged Duke of Norfolk; Edward Courtenay,
son of the Marquis of Exeter, beheaded in 1538; Tunstal and Gardiner,
the deprived Bishops of Durham and Winchester. Gardiner, in the name of
them all, congratulated Mary on her accession, and without complaining
of the injustice of their detention expressed their joy at seeing her
victorious over her enemies.[311]
“Ye are my prisoners!” exclaimed the Queen, bursting into tears.
Embracing them all, she ordered them to be released at once, and took
them with her to the royal apartments. Their goods, their rank, their
sees were restored. The next day, Gardiner was sworn a member of the
Privy Council, and three weeks later, was made Lord Chancellor of
England.
The names of twenty-seven persons concerned in the rebellion were
handed to the Queen. Of these she struck out sixteen, leaving eleven to
be tried. These were again reduced to seven—the Duke of Northumberland,
his son the Earl of Warwick, the Marquis of Northampton, Sir John
Gates, Sir Henry Gates, Sir Andrew Dudley and Sir Thomas Palmer.
The law then took its course, and they were condemned to death. But
Mary again intervened; four were reprieved, and three only of the
ringleaders, the Duke of Northumberland, Sir John Gates and Sir Thomas
Palmer, his chief advisers, were executed. The Emperor urged her in
vain to include the Lady Jane in the number of those to be tried for
high treason. The Queen spoke warmly in her defence, and declared that
she was less guilty than he believed her to be. Usurper though she had
been, she was but a tool, and Mary would not have her punished for
another’s crime. She had returned to the Tower as a prisoner, along
with her husband, but was allowed great freedom within its precincts.
The danger of her pretensions was, Mary declared, imaginary, but every
precaution should be taken before she was restored to liberty.[312]
With unprecedented mildness, the Queen had been inclined to pardon
even Northumberland, but Charles put pressure on her to sign his
death-warrant. The Duke made no defence at his trial, and on the
scaffold admitted his crime, expressed penitence, and declared that he
died a member of the Catholic and Roman Church.[313]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account