The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
To many, these things appeared quite otherwise than “goodly,” and there
was much murmuring at street corners and in taverns, angry discussions
that might easily end in brawls; and the forbidden words “papist” and
“heretic” were bandied about without much restraint. Consequently,
every householder was exhorted to “keep his children, apprentices and
other servants in such order and awe, as they follow their work the
week days, and keep their parish-churches the holy day, and otherwise
to be suffered to attempt nothing tending to the violation of common
peace, and that for the contrary, every one of them to stand charged
for his children and servants”.
Meanwhile, all eyes were fixed on Cranmer. It is more than probable,
that if he had remained quiescent he would have been suffered to
retire into private life, or to betake himself to the continent like
so many others of his opinions. Strype says that he was called before
the Council at the beginning of August, to answer for his share in
the late rebellion; that he was severely reprimanded, and ordered
to confine himself to his palace at Lambeth. But this statement is
unsupported by any evidence. There are no minutes of the Privy Council
between the 2nd and the 8th August, on which day Edward’s funeral took
place, when certainly Cranmer was not a prisoner either on parole or
otherwise. Strype seems to have been confused by a letter from the
Archbishop to Cecil, dated 14th August, in which he says that he has
been to court. This appearance in the Queen’s presence would account
for the report that was immediately circulated, to the effect that he
had pledged himself to Mary, to say Mass for her.[328] Disagreeable as
the rumour must have been to him in his position as reformer, worse was
to follow. Mass had once more been said in Canterbury Cathedral, and
Cranmer was accredited by the public voice with having said it. This
was more than he could endure, and fired with indignation, he took the
first irrevocable step towards his doom. Seizing his pen, he wrote the
celebrated _Declaration_ which, if the Archbishop of Canterbury has any
determining voice in the doctrine of the Established Church of England,
should for ever settle the question whether that Church teaches belief
in the Sacrifice of the Mass or not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account