The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
“As the devil, Christ’s ancient adversary is a liar and the father of
lies, even so hath he stirred up his servants and members to persecute
Christ, and his true word and religion, which he ceaseth not to do most
earnestly at this present. For whereas the most noble Prince of famous
memory, King Henry VIII., seeing the great abuses of the Latin masses,
reformed something herein, in his time; and also our late sovereign
Lord, King Edward VI. took the same whole away, for the manifold errors
and abuses thereof, and restored in the place thereof, Christ’s holy
Supper, according to Christ’s own institution, and as the apostles in
the primitive church used the same in the beginning, the devil goeth
about by lying, to overthrow the Lord’s holy Supper, and to restore the
Latin satisfactory masses, a thing of his own invention and device. And
to bring the same more easily to pass, some have abused the name of
me Thomas, Archbishop of Canterbury, bruiting abroad that I have set
up the mass at Canterbury, and that I offered to say mass before the
Queen’s Highness, and at Paul’s church, and I wot not where. I have
been well exercised these twenty years to suffer and bear evil reports
and lies; and have not been mych grieved thereat, and have borne all
things quietly. Yet when untrue reports and lies turn to the hindrance
of God’s truth, they be in no wise to be tolerated and suffered.
Wherefore, these be to signify to the world, that it was not I that did
set up the mass at Canterbury; but it was a false, flattering, lying
and dissembling monk which caused the mass to be set up there, without
my advice or counsel. [Here Foxe has the words omitted by Strype,
‘Reddet illi Dominus in die illo’.] And as for offering myself, to
say mass before the Queen’s Highness, or in any other place, I never
did, as her Grace knoweth well. But if her Grace will give me leave, I
shall be ready to prove against all that will say the contrary, that
the Communion Book, set forth by the most innocent and godly Prince,
King Edward VI. in his high court of Parliament is conformable to
the order which our Saviour Christ did both observe and command to
be observed, and which his Apostles and primitive church used many
years. Whereas the mass in many things not only hath no foundation of
Christ, his Apostles, nor the primitive church, but also is manifest
contrary to the same, and contains many horrible blasphemies in it.
And although many either unlearned or maliciously do report that Mr.
Peter Martyr[329] is unlearned, yet if the Queen’s Highness will
graunt thereunto, I with the said Mr. Peter Martyr, and other four
or five which I shall choose, will by God’s grace, take upon us to
defend that not only our Common Prayers of the churches, ministration
of sacraments, and other rites and ceremonies, but also that all the
doctrine and religion by our said sovereign lord King Edward VI. is
more pure and according to God’s word than any that hath been used in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account