The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
On the 13th November, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Guildford, Ambrose
and Henry Dudley, with the Lady Jane, proceeded from the Tower on foot,
to be arraigned at the Guildhall for high treason.[374] All pleaded
guilty, Cranmer protesting that he had acted unwillingly, in deference
to the authority of the officers of the Crown. Parliament confirmed
their attainder, and they were condemned to death. The Archbishop
appealed to the Queen, and hoped that the mercy that had been extended
to so many would be shown to him.[375] Notwithstanding that the
prisoners had been convicted, there was no intention on the part of the
Queen to proceed to the extremity of the law. She hoped, by keeping
them as hostages, to secure the loyalty of their friends, an optimistic
view that was not realised. Meanwhile, every indulgence compatible with
their situation was allowed to them. Both Cranmer and Ridley had the
freedom of the Tower, and the Queen’s garden, in common with the Lady
Jane and the others. Ridley was even sometimes invited to dine at the
Lieutenant’s table. The confinement of Latimer was more rigorous. He
had from the first been ordered into close prison, with his servant to
attend him.
Thus were matters constituted at the end of 1553. Elizabeth had
remained at court for some months, in a not very enviable position,
regarded by the Imperialists as the arch-enemy, and in reality the
object of every plot that was floated. Her fate seemed to keep her
perpetually hovering between the scaffold and the throne, to which de
Noailles bade her aspire, without intending, even if he succeeded in
dethroning Mary, to help her to mount it. She besought the Queen to
allow her to retire to her house at Ashridge, but Mary hesitated, in
giving her leave to depart, and if she had her watched, it was with
good reason. Her relations with de Noailles had been discovered, and
Arundel and Paget had told the Queen that the French ambassador had
visited the Princess three or four times under cover of the night, in
order to treat secretly of her marriage.[376] But Elizabeth denied
everything, and probably the accusation regarding the ambassador’s
visits was untrue. At any rate, Mary did not believe it, and took
occasion to make a new act of confidence in her sister. She embraced
her, and gave her two strings of large and magnificent pearls and
some rich sables. On taking leave, Elizabeth entreated Mary not to
believe the reports circulated to her disadvantage without hearing her.
Nevertheless, de Noailles thought that it only depended on Courtenay,
for her to follow him into Devon and Cornwall, where they would have a
good chance of securing the Crown for themselves. He had some reason
for this belief, the mayor and aldermen of Plymouth, thanks to his
interference, having sent to beg him to supplicate his master to take
them under his protection. They wished, they said, to place their town
in his hands, and were willing to receive whatever garrison he would
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account