The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
The terms of the marriage treaty, which had already been settled
between Gardiner and Renard, were in every way most honourable to
the English nation, safeguarding the national interests in a manner
far beyond all other royal marriage treaties before or since. It
was stipulated, that Philip should observe strictly the rights and
privileges of all classes, and that foreigners should be excluded
from public offices; that he should have no claim on English ships,
ammunition or treasure, that he should not involve the country in the
war which he and the Emperor were carrying on against Henry II., and
that as far as lay in his power, he would promote peace between England
and France.[386] If there were issue of the marriage, the eldest child
was to inherit Burgundy and the Low Countries, a valuable appanage
to the Crown of England; and if the Queen predeceased her husband,
Philip was to resign the guardianship of the child into English hands.
Moreover, this child, male or female, was also, in the event of the
death without issue of Don Carlos, Philip’s son by his first marriage,
to inherit the kingdoms of Spain and Sicily, the Duchy of Milan, and
all Philip’s other dominions. Sixty thousand pounds a year (equal to
about a million of present money) was to be settled on Mary as her
jointure, to be paid by Spain, if she outlived her husband. Besides
this, she was to share with him equally all his titles, honours and
dignities, which were to be mentioned in all official documents, after
their first titles of King and Queen of England.[387]
No political combination could have been more advantageous to England
as a make-weight against the marriage of Mary Queen of Scots with the
Dauphin. For it was not only _desirable_ that England should seek
the protection of the Empire against this important coalition, but
as Elizabeth had been virtually declared illegitimate by two Acts of
Parliament, Mary Stuart was heir presumptive to the throne, and it was
_necessary_ to raise an effectual barrier against the possibility of
England becoming a mere appendage to France.
Philip was to have nothing but the empty title of King, the only
advantages accruing to him from the marriage being the geographical
position of England, its political friendship as a counterpoise to the
alliance between France and Scotland, and the hope that Mary would give
birth to an heir. By the first he would secure an unmolested passage
through the English Channel, for his ships sailing between Spain and
the Netherlands; by the second the balance of power in Europe would
be restored, and by the third he would checkmate his enemy. Further
than this he would reap no benefit. England, with the exception of
London, was poor, and only just recovering from the consequences of a
debased currency, while the religious troubles of the last seventeen
years, dating from the Pilgrimage of Grace, had made revolt and popular
risings far too frequent for the prosperity of the country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account