The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
During the first half of the sixteenth century, England had played
but a subordinate part in the politics of Europe, and during Edward’s
reign, the Government had been so weak that Charles V. had been able
to demand Mary’s religious rights without compromise. France and the
Empire had disputed the honours, the wealth, the prestige of the
civilised world, and Mary had some reason to hope that by her marriage,
she would raise her country to the rank of a first-rate power. But de
Noailles and his friends had sown the seeds of discord too carefully,
party and religious feeling ran too high for dispassionate counsels to
prevail, and when, on the 14th and 15th January, the Chancellor read
aloud the articles of the treaty, first in the Upper, then in the Lower
House, calling attention in each, to the favourable terms stipulated
for, and to the provisions made to secure the national independence,
no satisfaction was expressed.[388] Immediately afterwards, the French
King ordered his ambassador to demand an audience, and to represent to
Mary his master’s grief at her projected union with his enemy, “having
desired more than anything in this world, to perpetuate friendship
with her all their lives”. Nevertheless, Henry wanted not peace, but
England as well as Scotland, for his daughter-in-law’s dowry, for
together, France, England and Scotland would have formed a compact
bulwark against the Empire. Spain and the Netherlands would have been
completely sundered, with no possibility of intercourse, and the Low
Countries would have fallen a facile prey to France.[389] At the
very time when he was charging his ambassador to reproach the Queen
with a want of friendship, de Noailles was secretly interviewing a
number of the malcontents, and organising a plot so widespread in its
ramifications, that had it succeeded, Mary must have been utterly
undone. Devonshire and Cornwall were to rise under Sir Peter Carew, in
favour of Elizabeth and Courtenay; Sir Thomas Wyatt, a young Kentish
gentleman, son of the poet of that name, was to disaffect the home
counties. The Duke of Suffolk was to incite to rebellion his tenantry
in the Midlands; Sir James Croft undertook to cause a revolt on the
borders of Wales, while the French fleet was under orders to be in
readiness to help the insurgents wherever the need should be greatest.
De Selve, formerly French ambassador in England, now envoy at Venice,
wrote to the Constable of France, advising him to do his utmost to
stir up and keep alive the discontent in England. This was done by
circulating the grossest and most self-contradictory falsehoods. It was
reported that Edward was still alive, that the Spaniards were coming
with an army of 8,000 men to take possession of the Tower, the ports
and the ships, that they possessed every vice and evil propensity
that could enslave and disgrace a nation, that the Queen had been
false to her promises not to make any change in religion or to marry a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account