The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Later on, the Council altered their tactics, and Bonner was accused of
dilatoriness in examining heretics.
Gardiner, preaching at Paul’s Cross, about this time, inveighed against
the prevailing heresies, but in such a manner that his audience took
his words in good part, although there were more than ten thousand
persons present. He touched discreetly on the Queen’s marriage, and had
it not been for Bonner’s articles, the agitation in London would have
gradually subsided. But the disturbances which they caused became so
serious, and the people remonstrated to such purpose, that they were
temporarily withdrawn. Even then, the Londoners were not satisfied,
erroneously connecting the Bishop’s measures with Spanish policy, and
clamouring for the arrival of Reginald Pole, who, in spite of his long
exile, was known to be a thorough Englishman at heart, and to have been
disinclined to the Queen’s marriage.
But although, when once the alliance was an accomplished fact, the
Emperor’s zeal for the salvation of souls appeared suddenly to awake,
and although he expressed keen anxiety that the Papal Legate should
proceed at once to his mission in England,[478] Pole was still
prevented from accomplishing it. His desire to return to his native
land was as great as that of his fellow-countrymen for his presence
among them, and on the 21st September, he wrote to Philip, complaining
that it was now a year since he commenced knocking at his palace gate,
nor as yet had any one opened it to him. Were the King to ask, “Who
knocks?” he would reply, “I am he, who in order not to exclude your
consort from the throne of England, endured expulsion from home and
country, and twenty years of exile”. Were he merely to say this much,
would he not seem worthy to return to the land of his birth, and to
have access to the King? But as he was not acting in his own name, nor
as a private person, he knocked and demanded in the name and person
of the vicegerent of the King of kings and the Pastor of man, namely,
the successor of Peter, or rather of Peter himself, whose authority,
heretofore so flourishing and vigorous in England, was now most
injuriously ejected thence. Through Pole, Peter had long been knocking
at the royal gate, which although open to others, was still closed to
him alone. The voice perhaps was not heard? Continuing in the same
strain, he expostulated with Philip and Mary, and concluded by saying
that if he personally were not acceptable, he begged that another might
be summoned in his stead.[479]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account