The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
But the fatal shadow of Anne, daughter of Sir Thomas Boleyn, had fallen
on the throne, and the king’s infatuation for her was to sweep both his
wife and his daughter into a vortex of misery from which there was no
escape for one of them but death. Whether Wolsey first insinuated the
doubt as to the validity of the king’s marriage, in order to pander to
Henry’s wandering fancies, or whether Henry himself, carried away by
his passion for Anne Boleyn, evolved the idea of a possible flaw in his
union with Katharine, matters little. The question was soon entangled
in a mass of chicanery, and whichever of the two may have been the
first to strike the match, it was clear to Wolsey, that his fortunes
depended henceforth on his keeping the flame alive. The subject had
been mooted as far back as 1525, and the first mention of the coming
divorce, of which we have any record, is contained in a letter from
Warham, Archbishop of Canterbury, to Wolsey. Referring to some other
business, Warham says, “it will be better not to proceed further, till
this great matter of the King’s grace be ended”.[66] Again in 1526,
after a long interval in which the subject seems to have been dropped,
the Bishop of Bath and Wells remarked to the Cardinal of York, “there
will be great difficulty _circa istud benedictum divortium_”.[67]
The sack of Rome by the Imperialists, and the Pope’s captivity delayed
the investigation of the cause by the papal courts to which it had
been referred, but in 1527, Henry’s “scruples” for having married his
brother’s widow began to be talked of as the King’s “great,” “secret”
or “private matter”.[68] Possibly, when Henry first began to study
the Scriptures, and the writers of antiquity in search of arguments
to support his “scruples,” he may not yet have fallen in love with
Anne, or at least Wolsey did not know that he had. When he did set his
mind on marrying her, it did not seem probable that his fancy would
outlive the necessary delays and preliminaries of a divorce, even if
it could be obtained, or that the ambition of the Boleyns would be
equal to the influence of the Cardinal. But during Wolsey’s absence
in France, the whole subject assumed a point and a piquancy hitherto
undreamed of. Wolsey had not fostered Henry’s desires in order to
further his marriage with the grand-daughter of a wealthy merchant. He
himself aimed at nothing short of the Papacy, and he thought that by
negotiating a brilliant marriage with a princess of France, he could
make for himself a convenient stepping-stone thereto, far more secure
than that which Mary’s marriage would afford. As the candidate of two
powerful monarchs, he would practically control the next conclave; but
the Boleyns could do nothing for him. He had yet to learn that Anne was
strong enough to work his ruin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account