The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
On the day appointed for the disputation, Dr. Chedsey, Prebendary of
St. Paul’s, afterwards a Canon of Christ Church, Oxford, was Cranmer’s
principal opponent, and kept up the discussion for nearly six hours,
at the end of which time the assembly dispersed crying, _Vicit
Veritas!_ Cranmer wrote an account of what had passed, and complained
to the Council that he had been unfairly treated in argument. He
begged them to obtain for him the Queen’s pardon. Thereupon he was
allowed to reopen the subject with John Harpsfield, a divinity student,
and Dr. Weston,[571] but in the end, it was declared that neither
Cranmer nor the other two bishops had successfully maintained their
_theses_, and they were all sent back to Bocardo. Here they remained
for eighteen months, continually pressed to recant. It was then
decided that they should have a formal trial for heresy, and Cardinal
Pole, as Papal Legate, was appointed to conduct it. The proceedings
with regard to Cranmer, as Primate of all England, were different
from those observed with the Bishops of London and Worcester. He was
cited to appear at Rome, to answer the charges made against him, but
this was a mere matter of form, as he was a prisoner, and the Pope
commissioned Cardinal Dupuy, who delegated his functions to the Bishop
of Gloucester, to represent his Holiness.[572] But Cranmer refused to
recognise the Pope’s authority, declaring that he had sworn never again
to consent to papal jurisdiction. On being reminded that he had also
sworn obedience to Rome, he sheltered himself behind the protest which
he had made before doing so. Sixteen charges in all were formulated
against him, supported by eight witnesses. He admitted the facts, but
not their interpretation, and objected to the witnesses as having also
formerly abjured the Pope. A report of the trial having been sent to
Rome, Cranmer wrote to the Queen, complaining that his “own natural
sovereign” had cited him before a foreign tribunal. Judgment was at
last pronounced against him for heresy in the papal courts, and he was
accordingly deprived, but the sentence of degradation was not carried
out for five months, during which time no efforts were spared to save
him. A papal commission was then issued to Bonner, Bishop of London,
and Thirlby, Bishop of Ely, for his degradation. The scene was a
painful one, and Dr. Thirlby is said to have been moved to tears during
the ceremony. The day fixed for it was the 14th February 1556. Cranmer
was brought before the two bishops at Christ Church, and the function
took place outside the church, in the great quadrangle. He was clothed
successively in vestments proper to a sub-deacon, a deacon, a priest, a
bishop and an archbishop, one over the other, but all made of canvas,
with a mitre and pallium of the same material.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account