The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
“You cannot imagine the grief of all the people at this abominable
government. They are so transported with indignation at what passes,
that they complain that your Majesty takes no steps in it, and I am
told by many respectable people, that they would be glad to see a fleet
come hither in your name, to raise the people; and if they had any
chief among themselves, who dared raise his head, they would require no
more.”
After signing the formal protest which Chapuys had drawn up for
her, Mary allowed herself to be placed in a litter, and conveyed to
Hatfield, where Elizabeth, then three months old, was provided with
an establishment. Dr. Fox, the King’s almoner, rode by the side of
the litter, in order to guard the Princess, and prevent any excessive
outbreak of indignation on the part of the populace. Nevertheless,
according to Anne’s scornful remark, Mary was treated, in the villages
through which she passed, “as if she were God Himself who had
descended from heaven”. Moreover, Dr. Fox, Henry’s own agent, took the
opportunity of telling her that she had done well, not to submit, and
he implored her for the love of God, and the welfare of the realm, to
remain firm.
On the 23rd December, Chapuys continues his narrative:[113]—
“When the Princess, who was taken off with only two attendants, had
arrived where the bastard was, the Duke (of Suffolk) asked her whether
she would not go and pay her respects to the Princess. She replied,
that she knew no other Princess in England except herself, and that
the daughter of Madame de Penebrok (_sic_) had no such title; but that
it was true, that since the King her father acknowledged her to be
his, she might call her ‘sister,’ as she called the Duke of Richmond
‘brother’. On her removing, the Duke asked her what word he should
carry to the King; to which she replied: ‘Nothing else except that
his daughter, the Princess, begged his blessing;’ and when he said
that he would not carry such a message, she told him curtly, he might
leave it; and after protesting several times, that what she did at the
King’s command, should not be to her prejudice, she retired to weep in
her chamber, as she does continually. Though the said Duke treated her
very roughly, the King reproached him for not having accomplished his
charge; that he went about it too softly; and he was resolved to take
steps to abate the stubbornness and pride of the Princess.”
Meanwhile, the same measure was to be meted out to mother and daughter,
and the Duke of Suffolk, albeit “he went about it too softly,” was in
each case Henry’s faithful agent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account