In those days the settlement of a new country was indeed a herculean
task with the meager facilities then existing. And this was
preeminently true of this town, which was still slumbering in a
dense primeval forest. Plows and all other implements were of the
crudest description. What little grain was grown by these ancient
farmers had to be cut with a knife or rude sickle, and then the grain
was separated from the straw by the tramp of horses upon the
threshing floor. It was afterward winnowed from the chaff by
hand-fans made of willow rods. This was the universal practice in
this region down to 1760. The first fanning mill was brought in here
just previous to this by Peter Gumaer. The wagons were made almost
entirely of wood and the harness of flax and tow. During the long
winter evenings while the men were making these things the women
were spinning and reeling yarn. Not the yarn of the idle gossiper,
as now, but the fiber and fabric of utility which went into their
clothing.
The old Esopus region was some fifty or sixty miles north and the
roads were left to the vagaries of Dame Nature. But these pioneers
had to cart their corn and other produce there for sale. Wheat was
the staple crop, and Jacob Codebeck of this town was the first to
attempt grinding it in a small mill. One of these millstones, about
two feet in diameter and three inches thick, is still in the Gumaer
cellar near where the old mill stood. This was afterward followed by
two other grist mills on the "Old Dam Brook." Then came the De Witt
mill in 1770, on the Neversink River near Cuddebackville, and others
in later years. These ancient mills had no devices for bolting the
flour as now; thus after the grinding process, the whole had to be
sifted by hand in order to secure the fine flour for bread-making and
other culinary uses.
One of the earliest saw mills was erected in this town soon after
1760.
It should be said in this connection that there is some traditionary
{_sic_}evidence of a still earlier settlement in this Minisink region
which takes the date back even to 1650. Most of these claims, however,
seem based upon certain letters written by Samuel Preston of
Stockport, Penn., in 1828. In these letters he gave the recollections
of John Lukens, Surveyor General of Pennsylvania, as to this very
ancient settlement. His memory extended back to 1730. On this rather
hazy authority it is claimed that the first settlement was prior to
1664, when the region was still in the possession of the Dutch, and
that the settlement was abandoned at the English conquest. But there
are no existing documents to substantiate any such claim, and the
entire weight of evidence seems to clearly disprove it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account