The History of Oswestry: Comprising the British, Saxon, Norman, and English eras; the topography of the borough; and its ecclesiastical and civic history; with notices of botany, geology, statistics, angling, and biography: to which are added sketches of the environsCathrall, William
History
The History of Oswestry: Comprising the British, Saxon, Norman, and English eras; the topography of the borough; and its ecclesiastical and civic history; with notices of botany, geology, statistics, angling, and biography: to which are added sketches of the environs
Cathrall, William
Natural history -- England -- Shropshire; Oswestry (England) -- History
Throughout the entire reign of Henry I. we read in the Welsh annals of
nothing but “a series of retaliated injuries arising in regular
succession; evils naturally springing from the passions, where they usurp
the sword of justice.” Henry died about the year 1135, and Stephen
succeeded to the English throne, and was soon embarked in a sea of
troubles. Engaged in continual hostilities, and in supporting a doubtful
title, he prudently concluded a peace with the Welsh, and allowed them to
retain the territories they had lately recovered, free of homage or
tribute. The incidents of Stephen’s reign were marked by no feature of
national interest; and the only reference made to it in connection with
this district is William Fitz-Alan’s espousal of the claim made by the
Empress Maud to the English crown. His union with other noblemen, to
dethrone Stephen, exposed him to danger, and he was compelled to leave
the kingdom, abandoning his lands and other property to the incensed
monarch. Whilst an exile from England he remained faithful to the
interests of the Empress; and on his return to this country on the death
of Stephen, and the accession to the throne of Henry II., he reaped the
reward of his spirit and fidelity, by receiving back all his forfeited
honours and estates, including the Castles of Oswestry and Clun. Of
Oswestry Castle we shall speak particularly in subsequent pages. Of Clun
we may at present say, that it remained in the direct line of William
Fitz-Alan down to the reign of Queen Elizabeth, when the last Earl died.
By the marriage of Mary Fitz-Alan with Philip Howard, the son of Thomas,
Duke of Norfolk, it became vested in that noble family. From them it
passed to the Walcotts, and afterwards, by purchase, to Lord Clive, in
whose family it continues. The Duke of Norfolk still retains the title
of “Baron of Clun,” as well as that of “Baron of Oswaldestre.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account