The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
[Illustration: The United States Frigate _Essex_.
_From a lithograph at the Naval Academy, Annapolis._]
Lest these stories seem to the humane reader to exaggerate the horrors
of life on a British naval ship, the following facts from the London
“Annual Register” for 1781 (page 41 of “Principal Occurrences”) will be
found conclusive: The total number of men “raised” for the navy, 1776
to 1780, was 170,928. Of these, 1,243 only were killed by the enemy,
while 18,545 “died,” and 42,069 _deserted_. More than ten per cent.
of all who were “raised” “died,” while almost one-fourth of them all
succeeded in deserting, in spite of the rigors of the imprisonment into
which they were carried.
It is necessary to give figures relating to the Revolutionary period
instead of the era of the War of 1812, because British officials have
absolutely refused to publish any such statistics since 1800.
What bearing all these facts have on the War of 1812 between the
United States and Great Britain, if not plain already, will very soon
appear. Animated by the belief that “our maritime supremacy is in fact
a part of the law of nations,” and by the further belief that “America
certainly cannot pretend to wage war with us; she has no navy to do it
with,” the British naval officers kidnapped English-speaking sailors
wherever they were found, even when these sailors were confessedly
born citizens of the United States. The British government did,
indeed, rule that where an American (natural-born) had a certificate
from the American government attesting his nativity--where he could,
by documentary evidence, prove his nativity--he might be excused by
the British “recruiting” gangs, but the rule was, in fact, a mere
diplomatic subterfuge for use should policy at any time require a
“disavowal.” In actual practice the only judge of a man’s citizenship
was the recruiting officer of the short-handed ship, and the
lithe-limbed Yankee sailor was just the kind of a man the British
press-gang was looking for. In fact, the British periodicals of that
day continuously scoffed at these citizenship papers, and it was
asserted in Parliament, as well as by the press, that the American
naval officers, as well as naval officials stationed on shore,
deliberately issued false papers at every opportunity--in short, that
the Americans, as a nation, were liars, perjurers, and forgers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account