The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
As early as 1747, when Massachusetts was a colony in most peaceful
relations with the home government, a press-gang caused a bloody riot
on the streets of Boston, where press-gangs were “already stigmatized
as barbarous by public opinion.” Indeed, one of the irritations leading
to the hostilities begun in 1775 was the work of the press-gang. The
war of the Revolution forever settled the question of the _right_ of
the British government to impress an American, but instead of stopping
such violations of the rights of a free-minded people it rather
increased them. For the hatred and contempt which the British felt
toward the Americans as a people during that war was intensified by
the result of it. It was the personal pleasure of the British officer
to get these Yankees where he could make them feel his power. It is on
record (see “Life of Elder Joseph Bates”) that the British officers
were particular to see that these Americans took off their hats when
the band played “God Save the King,” and that a common form of address
was “Here, you damned Yankee scoundrel,” do this or that. That the
“damned Yankee scoundrel” was triced up and flogged on the slightest
provocation by these officers, who confessedly enjoyed seeing flesh
creep under the lash, scarcely need be said.
No sooner was the war of the Revolution over and American merchant
ships free to sail to British ports than the outrages began on the
American seamen. It was literally true that the United States had
no navy and could not wage war with England. We did not have even
one ship-of-war left to carry the flag, and the party that ruled the
nation then was utterly opposed to building one. It called itself
the party of the people--it was fearful lest something or somebody
enslave the people--but when the friends of American seamen, shanghaied
into the barbarous slavery of a British warship, protested, this
“liberty-loving” party pigeon-holed the documents. But let us be just
in this matter. It was the liberty-loving party that did at last
declare war. The opposition preferred to trust in “the humanity” and
“sense of justice” which the offending nation was supposed to possess.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account