The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 2 (of 4) — John Shaqi
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 2 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 2 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
and reputation until, by the grounding of the _Philadelphia_, he became
a prisoner to the Tripolitans.
When war was declared in 1812 he was in the _Essex_. She was undergoing
repairs in New York Harbor. It was fortunate for Porter that she was
not ready to sail with Rodgers, for the delay enabled him to make a
cruise alone. And this cruise, because of what it shows about the
American armament and American seamen, is worth describing in detail.
[Illustration: David Porter.
_From an engraving by Edwin of the portrait by Wood._]
The _Essex_ was rated as a thirty-two-gun frigate, but she carried
forty-six carriage-guns all told. As to her numbers of guns she was
greatly underrated, but as to the effectiveness of her armament she
was the most overrated ship in the little navy. She had originally
mounted twenty-six long twelve-pounders on her main deck, while her
forecastle and poop carried sixteen twenty-four-pounder carronades,
“but official wisdom changed all this.” The Navy Department took out
twenty-four of her main deck long twelves and put thirty-two-pounder
carronades there instead. Then the poop and forecastle were swept clear
of the twenty-four-pounder carronades and four long twelves and sixteen
thirty-two-pounder carronades were mounted there. Porter protested over
and again, but in vain.
To fully understand why Porter should have protested against this
armament one must know the character of the guns. This is a matter that
has been discussed at very great length by almost every one who has
written on the navy of any nation. But, for the aid of the uninformed
reader, it may be said that an average long thirty-two-pounder
was eight and a half feet long, and weighed 4,500 pounds, while a
thirty-two-pounder carronade was four feet long and weighed but 1,700
pounds. Being thick at the breech and long, the long gun had a long
range. That is, a heavy powder charge would act on the ball throughout
the length of the long bore and so hurl the ball over a long range.
The short gun being short, and thin at the breech, could stand only
about one-third of the charge of powder used in the long gun. Where the
long thirty-two burned seven pounds of powder and had a range, when
elevated one degree, of six hundred and forty yards (not counting the
ricochet leaps), the short thirty-two burned two and a half pounds of
powder and had a range of three hundred and eighty yards.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account