The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
circumstances of almost unprecedented severity exercised toward them
whilst on board the _Constitution_,” it placed on its records a
falsehood. The charge was false on its face, for the lowest count of
the crew of the _Constitution_, after the battle, as printed in any
American work, gives her four hundred and forty-four men, of whom
ten, at most, were wounded more or less. After manning her prizes she
still had an ample crew to work the ship and man another prize or two.
Because the Yankee sailors were treated like men, were well-fed and
well-paid, the Yankee frigates in this war, with the exception of the
black-listed _Chesapeake_, were fully manned. There was no occasion for
recruiting among the British prisoners. Moreover, when this falsehood
was first published, the officers of the _Constitution_ denied under
oath the charge, and said further, that, instead of trying to seduce
the British crews, many of the British seamen volunteered to ship
on board the _Constitution_ but were in no case permitted to do so,
because “the loss of the _Chesapeake_ had taught us the danger of
having renegades aboard.”
[Illustration: Medal Awarded to Charles Stewart after the Battle of the
_Constitution_ with the _Cyane_ and _Levant_.]
The _Constitution_ lost six killed and nine more or less wounded. The
donkey frigate _Cyane_ lost twelve killed and twenty-six wounded out
of her crew of one hundred and eighty; the _Levant_ lost seven killed
and sixteen wounded out of one hundred and forty. The British gunners
did about as poorly as usual in their Navy of that day. The Yankee
gunners did rather worse than usual. They were at close range long
enough to sink both of the enemy’s ships had they done as well as the
_Hornet’s_ crew did with the British _Peacock_, or the _Wasp_ with the
British _Avon_. The battle was, and is, famous not for its gunnery, but
for the magnificent manner in which Captain Stewart handled his ship.
Other captains--Hull and Bainbridge, for instance--had handled her
when a single enemy turned and twisted and fore-reached, but Stewart
backed and filled and reached and wore to meet the manœuvres of two
ships that, commanded by the ablest of British seamen, strove to cross
and rake him. And not only did he meet their movements--not only did
he avoid a raking himself, but he raked each of them repeatedly. No
better seamanship was ever displayed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account