The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
Commodore James Barron, as the reader will remember, was suspended
from the navy because he had gone to sea with his ship unprepared for
action, although the British officers at Norfolk had been very free in
making threats. In the course of years it became Decatur’s duty, as one
of the Naval Commissioners, to decide on the advisability of restoring
Barron to active service. Barron had continually protested that his
punishment was “cruel and unmerited,” and had made many attempts to
get into active service, but Decatur was unable to approve of all that
Barron had done. Decatur distinctly “disclaimed all personal enmity
toward him,” but said frankly that “he entertained and did still
entertain the opinion that his conduct, _since that affair_, had been
such as ought forever to bar his readmission into the service.” Barron
had remained out of the United States during all the War of 1812,
although the term for which he was suspended was but five years. It was
this, added to Barron’s failure to have the _Chesapeake_ ready for a
fight, that influenced Decatur.
The correspondence between Barron and Decatur on the subject of
Barron’s readmission began in June, 1819, and ended in February, 1820.
Barron’s last letter to Decatur was dated at Norfolk, January 16, 1820.
It said:
SIR: Your letter of the 20th ultimo I have received. In it you
say that you have now to inform me that you shall pay no further
attention to any communications that I may make to you other
than a direct call to the field; in answer to which I have only
to reply that whenever you will consent to meet me on fair and
equal grounds, that is, such as two honorable men may consider
just and proper, you are at liberty to view this as that call.
The whole tenor of your conduct to me justifies this course of
proceeding on my part. As for your charges and remarks, I regard
them not--particularly your sympathy. You know not such a feeling.
I cannot be suspected of making the attempt to excite it.
I am, sir, yours, etc., JAMES BARRON.
To this Decatur replied on January 24th as follows:
SIR: I have received your communication of the 16th, and am at
a loss to know what your intention is. If you intend it as a
challenge, I accept it, and refer you to my friend, Commodore
Bainbridge, who is fully authorized to make any arrangement he
pleases as regards weapons, mode or distance.
Your obedient servant, STEPHEN DECATUR.
On March 22, 1820, they met at Bladensburg, near Washington. Decatur
was accompanied by Commodore Bainbridge and Barron by Captain Elliott,
who, perhaps because his own conduct in the face of the enemy had been
assailed, was a strong partisan of Barron.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account