The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
The losses of the _Essex_ were fifty-eight killed and mortally wounded,
thirty-nine severely wounded, twenty-seven slightly wounded, and
thirty-one missing, the most of whom, if not all, were drowned in
trying to swim ashore when the _Essex_ was on fire. These numbers were
given by the American officers. Hillyar reported that the _Essex_
lost one hundred and eleven in killed or wounded. The difference in
these official reports is unquestionably due to the fact that Hillyar,
naturally enough, did not count as wounded those of his prisoners who
had received minor scratches and contusions, even though these wounds
had temporarily disabled the men during the battle. Nevertheless,
the favorite British historian James, although he had read Hillyar’s
letter, wrote:
“The _Essex_, as far as is borne out by proof (the only safe way where
an American is concerned), had twenty-four men killed and forty-five
wounded. But Captain Porter, thinking by exaggerating his loss to
prop up his fame, talks of fifty-eight killed and mortally wounded,
thirty-nine severely, twenty-seven slightly.”
And Allen, whose latest edition appeared in 1890, follows the false
statement of James.
The British loss was, of course, trifling. They had five killed and ten
wounded. But it is not unconsoling to reflect that the _Phœbe_ received
in all eight shot at and under the water-line, and that she and the
_Cherub_ were not a little cut up aloft--in short the damage inflicted
by the _Essex_ was greater than the British _Java_, _Macedonian_,
and _Guerrière_ all together inflicted on the American ships in their
battles. Captain Hillyar had good reason for writing to his superior
that “the defence of the _Essex_, taking into consideration our
superiority of force and the very discouraging circumstance of her
having lost her maintopmast and being twice on fire, did honor to her
brave defenders.”
As Roosevelt says, “Porter certainly did everything a man can do to
contend successfully with the overwhelming force opposed to him. As an
exhibition of dogged courage it has never been surpassed since the time
when the Dutch Captain Kaesoon, after fighting two long days, blew up
his disabled ship, devoting himself and all his crew to death, rather
than surrender to the hereditary foes of his race.”
While no one can justly criticise Captain Hillyar for his handling of
his ship during the battle, there is something to be said about his
having made an attack on the American ship under the circumstances.
And this cannot be better said than in the words of Roosevelt, whose
fairness has been acknowledged by the English in the most emphatic
manner. He says:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account