The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
At that Warrington hauled the _Peacock_ close under the port quarter
of the _Epervier_ and opened a deadly fire of solid shot directed
chiefly at the enemy’s water-line--the favorite target of the Yankee
gunners. One easily pictures the scene at this time as the Yankee
crews, stripped to the waist, in the warm summer air, worked like white
devils in the sulphurous smoke over their guns. They waved their arms
and cheered as they saw the shot knock the splinters low down on the
black-painted hull of the half-obscured enemy that was now adrift,
unable to turn either to port or starboard. But some of them aimed high
enough to dismount every gun on the port side of the _Epervier_, which
faced the Yankee.
Meantime, the _Epervier_ had been gathering stern way and was drifting
on board the _Peacock_. Allen says Captain Wales thought to wear the
_Epervier_ in order to run on board the _Peacock_, but this is absurd,
because she was aback.
On seeing that the _Epervier_ was likely to fall aboard the _Peacock_,
Captain Wales called his men aft, intending to make a last brave
effort by boarding. But, as James says, “the British crew declined a
measure so fraught with danger.” Allen says: “A large proportion of the
crew evinced a great distaste for the measure.” So Captain Wales hauled
down his flag at 11 o’clock. The action had lasted forty-five minutes.
Captain Wales showed conspicuous bravery and ability, and his chief
officer, Lieutenant John Hackett, ably seconded him. In fact, Hackett
had his left arm shattered and was dangerously wounded in the hip by a
splinter, “but it was with difficulty that this gallant officer could
be persuaded” to leave the deck.
That the crew should have flinched is not a matter of wonder. The
British sailors had been accustomed to go at the Frenchmen “hammer and
tongs,” and “whoop and hurrah.” It was a lark to meet a Latin-blood
crew. But in 1812 they had a new kind of an enemy to face. It should be
remembered that, after they had “seen the countenance” of this enemy
for a few months, even the British Admiralty flinched, for James says,
on page 402 of Volume VI., that “the Admiralty had issued an order
that no eighteen-pounder frigate was voluntarily to engage one of the
twenty-four-pounder frigates of America.”
This is a slight digression from the story of the _Peacock-Epervier_
fight, but it seems worth the making because it offers an explanation
of the rancor and the deliberate falsehoods of the British writers
when referring to British naval contests with Yankees. A knowledge of
the whole truth about the prowess of American naval seamen had had a
disturbing influence on the minds of the British sailors on more than
one occasion, and the records of the sea-fights with the Yankees were
deliberately falsified in order to preserve the self-confidence of
British Jack.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account