The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
However, the success of the _Princeton_ as a ship was so pronounced
that money was appropriated from time to time for others designed much
as she was until the navy had six screw frigates--the _Niagara_, the
_Roanoke_, the _Colorado_, the _Merrimac_, the _Minnesota_, and the
_Wabash_; six screw sloops of the first class--the _San Jacinto_, the
_Lancaster_, the _Brooklyn_, the _Hartford_, the _Richmond_, and the
_Pensacola_, besides eight screw sloops of the second class, of which
the _Iroquois_ was a type, and five of the third class, of which the
_Mohawk_ was a type. There was also a screw frigate on the stocks at
the Portsmouth, New Hampshire, dock-yard. The guns that these ships
carried, when compared with those of the war of the Revolution, were
quite as interesting as the ships themselves.
[Illustration: U. S. Frigate _Pensacola_ off Alexandria.
_From a photograph taken in 1865._]
The prejudices in the way of improving great guns were not only strong,
but they were founded on experiences that were seemingly convincing
beyond peradventure. For instance, under Charles V a cannon was cast
at Genoa that was fifty-eight calibres long; that is, it was of about
six inches diameter of bore and twenty-nine feet long. When fired,
its ball of thirty-six pounds weight had less range than an ordinary
twelve-pounder. So they cut off four feet of the gun and found that its
range increased. Cutting off three feet more still further increased
the range, as did another cut of six inches--“which shows,” says
Simpson’s text-book on gunnery, printed in 1862, “that there is for
each piece a maximum length which should not be exceeded.” So that
dictum stood in the way of arriving at the design of a gun like the
modern rifle, that would really give the greatest possible range to
a projectile. Then, the distribution of the metal in the cannon with
which Arnold fought on Lake Champlain seems now ridiculous. One must
needs see a picture of the old gun beside one of the guns as developed
just previous to the Civil War to realize the difference; but it
may be said that, with the bell-shaped muzzle and the “rings” and
“reinforces,” the old gun in outline had as many ups and downs as some
step-ladders, while the cast-iron weapon of 1860 was as smooth and
symmetrical as the hull of a Yankee clipper.
[Illustration: A Twelve-pound Bronze Howitzer--the First One Made in
the United States.
_From a photograph of the original at the Brooklyn Navy Yard._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account