[282] Stat. 21 Henry VIII, c. 24, cited in Taswell-Langmead, _Eng. Const. Hist._ 301. 1 _Parl. Hist._ 507. [283] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 560, 578. [284] 23 Henry VIII, c. 20, in Adams and Stephens, _Sel. Doc._ 144. [285] 25 Henry VIII, c. 20. [286] 25 Henry VIII, c. 21. [287] 26 Henry VIII, c. 3. [288] 25 Henry VIII, c. 19. [289] Dowell, 1 _Taxation and Taxes_, 202, quoting 2 _Mackintosh_, 433, appendix. [290] Taswell-Langmead, _Eng. Const. Hist._ 377, quoting 4 _Parl. Hist._ 480. [291] The subsidy at this time, by a conservative estimate, amounted probably to £80,000, making the demand equal to £240,000. [292] 1 Hallam, _Const. Hist. Eng._ 375, quoting D’Ewes, 486. [293] Gneist. _Const. Hist. Eng._ 546. [294] Taswell-Langmead, _Eng. Const. Hist._ 177. [295] 1 _Parliamentary History of England_, London, 1806, 967, 970. [296] The case is in 1 _Parl. Hist._ 998-1017. See also Taswell-Langmead, _Eng. Const. Hist._ 267-268. [297] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1030-1042. [298] 1 Ibid. 1044-1045. [299] The rate of this grant of tunnage and poundage: Tunnage, 3 s. on every tun of wine imported, save that on the tun of sweet wines the charge was 6 s., and on the awm of Rhenish, 1 s. Poundage, 1 s. on every 20 s. of goods or merchandise imported or exported, except woolen manufactures; on tin and pewter the charge was 2 s. Wool of denizens, 33 s. 4 d. on the sack or 240 woolfells and £3, 6 s., 8 d. on the last of hides.--1 _Parl. Hist._ 1046. [300] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1069-1070. [301] Trevelyan, _England Under the Stuarts_, 107. [302] Medley, _Eng. Const. Hist._ 235. [303] Prothero, _Statutes and Constitutional Documents, 1559-1625_, lxxv. [304] Stat. 45 Edw. III, cap. 4. [305] The case is reported in Prothero, _Stat. and Const. Doc._ 340-342. [306] 2 _State Trials_, 481. [307] Prothero, _Stat. and Const. Doc._ 354. [308] The arguments of Hakewill and Whitelocke are given in detail in Prothero, _Stat. and Const. Doc._ 342-353. [309] Taswell-Langmead, _Eng. Const. Hist._ 395, quoting from Petyt, _Jus Parliamentum_, 322, 323. [310] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1122. [311] Prothero, _Stat. and Const. Doc._ 411. [312] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1133. [313] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1159. [314] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1166. [315] 2 Gardiner, _Hist. Eng._ _[_1603-1616_]_ 172. [316] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1179-1180. [317] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1187. [318] This was “the revival of the ancient right of Parliamentary impeachment--the solemn accusation of an individual by the Commons at the bar of the Lords--which had lain dormant since the impeachment of the Duke of Suffolk in 1449.” For further details see Taswell-Langmead, _Eng. Const. Hist._ 409 et seq. [319] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1208. [320] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1262. [321] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1300-1301. [322] 1 Ibid. 1316-1317. [323] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1361-1363. [324] 1 Ibid. 1366-1371. [325] 1 _Parl. Hist._ 1487-1488. [326] 1 Hallam, _Const. Hist. Eng._ 508, 509. [327] 2 _Parl. Hist._ 6. [328] 2 Ibid. 33. [329] 2 Ibid. 35-37.