The History of Parliamentary Taxation in EnglandMorgan, Shepard Ashman
History
The History of Parliamentary Taxation in England
Morgan, Shepard Ashman
Taxation -- Great Britain; Taxation -- Great Britain -- History
And whereas of late great companies of soldiers and marines have been
dispersed into divers counties of the realm, and the inhabitants
against their wills have been compelled to receive them into their
houses, and there to suffer them to sojourn, against the laws and
customs of the realm, and to the great grievance and vexation of the
people....
They do therefore humbly pray your most Excellent Majesty, that no man
hereafter be compelled to make or yield any gift, loan, benevolence,
tax, or such like charge, without common consent by Act of Parliament;
and that none be called to make answer, or take such oath, or to
give attendance, or be confined, or otherwise molested or disquieted
concerning the same, or for refusal thereof; ... and that your Majesty
will be pleased to remove the said soldiers and marines, and that your
people may not be burdened in time to come. 2 _Parl. Hist._ 374-6. The
Petition of Right may also be found in S. R. Gardiner, _Constitutional
Documents of the Puritan Revolution, 1625-1660_, 66-70; Adams and
Stephens, _Sel. Doc._ 339-342. Taswell-Langmead, _Eng. Const. Hist._
430-433.
[343] Gardiner, _Const. Doc._ 66, note 2.
[344] 2 _Parl. Hist._ 432.
[345] 2 _Parl. Hist._ 433-434.
[346] 2 _Parl. Hist._ 442, 443.
[347] 2 Ibid. 449, 453.
[348] 2 _Parl. Hist._ 454.
[349] 2 Ibid. 482.
[350] 2 _Parl. Hist._ 457, 491.
[351] Gardiner, _Const. Doc._ 82, 83; 2 _Parl. Hist._ 491.
[352] “The king’s declaration of the causes of the late dissolution.”
Gardiner, _Const. Doc._ 83-99; 2 _Parl. Hist._ 492-504.
[353] 2 _Parl. Hist._ 525.
[354] 2 Hallam, _Const. Hist. Eng._ 15.
The “parchments in the Tower” might readily have included the
following, which exhibits an historical precedent for the ship money:
“1008. Rex Anglorum Aegelredus de ccc. x. cassatis unam trierem, de
novem vero loricam et cassidem fieri, et per totam Angliam naves
intente praecipit fabricari.” 1 Florentii Wigorniensis Monachi,
_Chronicon ex Chronicis_, 160.
1 Freeman, _Norman Conquest_, 647, note LL., cites 3 _Codex
Diplomaticus_, 351, to show that before 1008 a levy of ships was
not unknown. Archbishops Aelfric upon his death gave to the people
of Wiltshire and Kent a ship. Wiltshire is an inland county. It is
justifiable, then, to believe that “per totam Angliam” may be taken
literally, and that Ethelred really exacted a ship from every 310 hides
throughout England.
[355] Gardiner, _Const. Doc._ 105-108.
[356] Taswell-Langmead, _Eng. Const. Hist._ 443; Trevelyan, _England
Under the Stuarts_, 163.
[357] Clarendon, _History of the Rebellion_, i, 136.
[358] Gardiner, _Const. Doc._ 108, note 2.
[359] Gardiner, _Const. Doc._ 108, 109.
[360] 2 Hallam, _Const. Hist. Eng._ 23.
[361] Mr. St. John did not enter into a consideration of the legality
of the modern impositions of the outports, levied by authority of the
Crown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account