The History of Philosophy in IslamBoer, T. J. de (Tjitze J.)
Islamic
The History of Philosophy in Islam
Boer, T. J. de (Tjitze J.)
Islamic philosophy -- History
attributes, maintained that God is by his essence a Being who knows, a
Mutazilite dialectian expressed it thus: God is a Being who knows, but
by means of a knowledge, which He himself is.
In the opinion of the Traditionalists the conception of God was in this
way being robbed of all its contents. The Mutazilites hardly got beyond
negative determinations,—that God is not like the things of this
world,—that he is exalted above Space, Time, Movement, and so on; but
they held fast to the doctrine that he is the Creator of the world.
Although little could be asserted regarding the Being of God, it was
thought he could be known from his works.
For the Mutazilites as well as for their opponents, the Creation was an
absolute act of God, and the existence of the world an existence in
time. They energetically combated the doctrine of the eternity of the
world,—a doctrine supported by the Aristotelian philosophy, and which
had been widely spread throughout the East.
6. We have already found ‘Speech’ or ‘the Word’, given as one of the
eternal attributes of God; and, probably by way of conformity with the
Christian doctrine of the Logos, there was taught in particular the
eternity of the Koran which had been revealed to the Prophet. This
belief in an eternal Koran by the side of Allah, was downright
idolatry, according to the Mutazilites; and in opposition thereto the
Mutazilite Caliphs proclaimed it as a doctrine accepted by the
State,—that the Koran had been created: Whoever denied this doctrine
was publicly punished. Now although the Mutazilites in maintaining this
dogma were more in harmony with the original Islam than their
opponents, yet history has justified the latter, for pious needs proved
stronger than logical conclusions. Many of the Mutazilites, in the
opinion of their brethren in the faith, were far too ready to make
light of the Koran, the Word of God. If it did not agree with their
theories, it received ever new interpretations. In actual fact reason
had more weight with many than the revealed Book. By comparing not only
the three revealed religions together, but these also with Persian and
Indian religious teaching and with philosophic speculation, they
reached a natural religion, which reconciled opposites. This was built
up on the basis of an inborn knowledge, universally necessary,—that
there is one God, who, as a wise Creator, has produced the world, and
also endowed Man with reason that he may know his Creator and
distinguish between Good and Evil. Contrasted with this Natural or
Rational Religion, acquaintance with the teaching of revelation is then
something adventitious,—an acquired knowledge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account