The History of Silk, Cotton, Linen, Wool, and Other Fibrous Substances;: Including Observations on Spinning, Dyeing, and Weaving.Gilroy, Clinton G.
History
The History of Silk, Cotton, Linen, Wool, and Other Fibrous Substances;: Including Observations on Spinning, Dyeing, and Weaving.
Gilroy, Clinton G.
History, Ancient; Textile fabrics -- History
The genus _Hibiscus_, Linn. is very abundant in India. The bark of a
certain species of this genus, especially of H. _Tiliaceus_ and H.
_Cannabinus_, is now very extensively employed for making _cordage_,
and might unquestionably have been used for making cloth[200].
[200] Cavanilles, Tab. 52, fig. 1, represents H. Cannabinus, the
leaf of which is like that of hemp. Tab. 55, fig. 1, represents H.
Tiliaceus, in the description of which we read “_cortice in funes
ductili_;” and Cavanilles says, the inhabitants of the South Sea
Islands (_Australium insularum_) use in their ships and boats ropes
made from the bark.
H. _Tiliaceus_ is also represented in Rheede’s Hort. Malabaricus (vol.
i. fig. 30.). It grows about 15 feet high.
Dr. Wallich (Cat. of Indian Woods, p. 18.) mentions two other species
as used for making cordage from the bark.
The late Mr. John Hare, who lived in India a long time, says, that a
coarse kind of cloth, used for making sacks, &c., is now woven from
Hibiscus bark.
As a further evidence, that the _Molochina_ mentioned in the Periplus
were made from the bark of the Hibiscus, we may refer to that admirable
specimen of Eastern taste and ingenuity, the Sacontăla of the great
Indian dramatist Calidāsa. Several passages of this poem make
mention of the _Valcăla_, which the Sanscrit Lexicons, themselves
of great antiquity, explain as meaning either bark, or a vesture made
from it. We learn from Dr. Wallich, a celebrated Indian botanist, that
many kinds of Hibiscus had this quality in an eminent degree, and, as
their bark was in common use for making all kinds of cordage, it might
undoubtedly be employed for weaving.
The Sacontăla is of a date as ancient as the Periplus. Professor
Von Bohlen (_Das alte Indien_, _vol._ ii. _p._ 477.) asserts, that the
author Calidāsa certainly flourished as early as the first century
B. C. Sir William Jones makes him older by several centuries. (_Works_,
_vol._ vi. _p._ 206.) The place also agrees as well as the time. The
Hibiscus Tiliaceus, according to Sir J. E. Smith, is “one of the most
common trees in every part of the East Indies, thriving in all sorts
of situations and soils, and cultivated for the sake of its shade
even more than the beauty of its flowers, in towns and villages and
by road-sides. A coarse cordage,” he adds, “is made of the bark; the
wood is light and white, useful for small cabinet-work; the mucilage of
the whole plant is applied to some medical purposes.” The Molochina,
mentioned in the Periplus, were brought from Ozene and Tagara, and may
have come from still further North. The hermitage, described in the
drama, was at the foot of the Himalaya Mountains, and near the river
Malina, and, according to the representations given by the poet, the
Valcălas (translated by Sir W. Jones “_mantles of woven bark_,” and
by Chézy, “_vêtemens d’écorce_”), were worn both by the hermits and by
the beautiful Sacontăla, while she was their inmate[201].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account