The History of Silk, Cotton, Linen, Wool, and Other Fibrous Substances;: Including Observations on Spinning, Dyeing, and Weaving.Gilroy, Clinton G.
History
The History of Silk, Cotton, Linen, Wool, and Other Fibrous Substances;: Including Observations on Spinning, Dyeing, and Weaving.
Gilroy, Clinton G.
History, Ancient; Textile fabrics -- History
[201] Translation of the Sacontăla, Sir W. Jones’s Works, vol. vi. pp.
217. 225. 289. Original, ed. Chézy, Paris, 1830, p. 7, l. 10.; p.
9, l. 10; p. 24, l. 7.; p. 131, l. 14. Chézy’s translation, pp. 10.
27. 142. 143. See also Heeren, Ideen, i. 2. p. 648.
“Valcălas” are mentioned in precisely the same manner in the
Ramayana, one of the most noted of the heroic poems of ancient India.
They are represented as coarse garments worn by ascetics.
If the explanation now given be admitted as applicable to the Molochina
of the Periplus, it may throw light upon some other passages of ancient
authors.
Ctesias, in his _Indica_[202], mentions “_sheets made from trees_.”
[202] Cap. 22. Fragmenta, ed. Bähr. p. 253. 326.
Strabo’s account of the webs, which he calls _Serica_, an account
derived from the writings of Nearchus, admiral of Alexander the Great,
represents those webs as made from fibres, _which were scraped from the
bark of trees_. This would apply exactly to the supposed use of the
Hibiscus for making cloth. The bark must have been first stript from
the tree, and the fibres then scraped from the _inside of the bark_.
To the same source we may, we think, trace the idea of Arethas (_in
Apoc._ _c._ 57.), that the Byssus, Rev. xix. 8., was “_the bark of an
Indian tree made into flax_.”
Although the date of the following inscription, found at Rome, is
uncertain, it may be conveniently brought in here. It is published by
Muratori, _Novus Thesaurus Vet. Inscriptionum_, _tom._ ii. _p._ 939.
P. AVCTIVS P. L. LYSANDER.
VESTIARIVS. TENVIARIVS.
MOLOCHINARIVS. VOT. SOL.
Muratori in his Note says, that “Vestiarius Tenuiarius” was the man
who made thin garments, and “_Molochinarius_” the man who made such
garments of a mallow color.
The authors, next in regard to antiquity, who make mention of
_Molochina_, are the writers of the Latin Comedy, Statius Cæcilius, who
died 169 B. C., and Plautus, who died 184 B. C.
Nonius Marcellus (_l._ xvi.) quotes the following line from the
_Pausimachus_ of the former dramatist:
Carbasina, molochina, ampelina.[203]
[203] See C. C. Statii Fragmenta, a Leonhardo Spengel, Monachii 1829,
p. 35. Statius chiefly copied Menander (_Gellius_, ii. _c._
16.); but it is not certain that Menander wrote any play called
_Pausimachus_.
The passage of Plautus is in the Aulularia (_Act_ iii. _Scene_ v. _l._
40.), where we have a ludicrous enumeration, extending through more
than ten lines, of all the persons concerned in the manufacture or sale
of garments.
Solearii astant, astant molochinarii.
All the lexicographers and commentators explain _Molochinarius_ to
be one who dyes cloth of the color of the mallow. _Lanarius_ was
a woollen-draper; _Coactiliarius_, a dealer in felts, a hatter;
_Lintearius_ a linen-draper; and _Sericarius_ a silk-mercer. According
to the same analogy, _Molochinarius_ would mean _a dealer in
Molochina_, i. e. _in all kinds of cloth made from mallows_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account