The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
A very short time elapsed before Auvergne was again involved in
treasonable projects. His confederates were the marchioness of Verneuil,
her father, Francis de Balsac d’Entragues, and an Englishman named
Thomas Morgan. The duke of Bouillon, and other nobles, were also ready
to lend their aid. The marchioness, who, in consequence of the promise
of marriage which the king had given to her during the insanity of his
passion, affected to consider herself as his wife, was irritated by the
birth of a dauphin, which seemed to shut out the possibility of her son
ever possessing what she called his right. D’Entragues was deeply wounded
in his feelings, by the stain which Henry’s licentious love for his
daughter had cast upon him. Some writers,—who appear to suppose that a
French father could not think himself dishonoured by his child becoming
a king’s concubine,—throw doubts on the sincerity of d’Entragues’
indignation; but I can see no real grounds for their so doing. There
is an air of sincerity, in what he says upon this subject, which is
greatly in his favour. After touching upon the ingratitude with which
his faithful services had been repaid, he adds, “Borne down by years and
maladies, I was condemned to suffer more deadly blows from blind fortune.
My daughter, the sole consolation of my old age, pleased the king, and
this last stroke completed my misery. Grief aggravated my maladies, and
still more intense mental anguish was joined to the pains which my body
endured. I found myself exposed to all the gibes of the courtiers, and
that which generally constitutes the happiness of a father, and which
ought to have formed the glory and felicity of my family, was, on the
contrary, the cause of my shame, of the dishonour of my house, and of
the insulting scorn with which I was overwhelmed.” As often as he
implored for leave to withdraw from court he was refused, and at length
he was forbidden to see his daughter. Not content with inflicting these
wrongs upon him, Henry was striving to seduce his second daughter also.
Assuredly if such injuries are not sufficient to rouse the wrath of a
father, it is difficult to imagine what would be. That d’Entragues keenly
felt them is certain; for he more than once endeavoured to intercept
and kill the king, while he was on his way to the marchioness, and to
her sister, and Henry is said to have narrowly escaped. The design to
assassinate is indefensible; but it at least proves that the father was
in earnest. At a subsequent period, Henry said to d’Entragues, “Is it
true, as is reported, that you meant to kill me?” “Yes, Sire,” replied
the undaunted noble, “and the idea will never be out of my mind, while
your majesty persists to blot my honour in the person of my daughter.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account