The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
When Henry found that his intended prey was beyond his reach, his
behaviour resembled rather that of a madman than of a sage monarch,
at the mature age of fifty-seven. He ran about asking advice of his
courtiers, the ministers were summoned, councils were held, parties of
troops were despatched to seize the fugitives, and war was threatened
against Spain, if she refused to give them up. When Sully was told of
what had happened, he replied in a surly tone, “I am not astonished at
it, sire; I foresaw it clearly and warned you of it; and had you taken
my advice a fortnight ago, when he was going to Moret, you would have
put him into the Bastile, where you would find him now, and where I
should have kept a good watch over him for you.” Such was the morality
of the austere Sully! This “well-seeming Angelo,” who has been praised,
at least as much as he deserves, could be indignant at the idea of the
monarch marrying Henrietta d’Entragues, his mistress; but he could see
no dishonour in that monarch breaking his plighted word, as well as all
moral obligations, by seducing the wife of his nephew; nor in he himself
volunteering his assistance to forward an adulterous intercourse, by
prompting the seizure of the injured husband, and becoming his gaoler!
It was not without reason that the prince dreaded to trust his wife
within the corrupted atmosphere of the French court. Had she remained
there, it appears certain that she must have fallen. As it was, her
fidelity was, for a moment, on the point of being shaken. Henrietta was
little more than sixteen, and the glory of the sovereign, his boundless
generosity to her, and his idolatrous fondness, dazzled her imagination
so far, that, while she was at Brussels, a correspondence was actually
carried on between them. An attempt was made by Henry’s emissaries to
carry her off, but it failed. When d’Estrées, marquis of Cœuvres, who
conducted this attempt, was reproached for his baseness by Condé, his
defence was, that he had acted upon orders from the king his master, and
that it was his duty to execute them, whether they were just or unjust.
Henrietta repaired her momentary error by her subsequent conduct.
Not believing himself to be safe, Condé removed to Milan, where he
published a manifesto to justify his having quitted France. From
policy he passed over in silence the main cause of his flight; but he
indemnified himself by pouring forth all the bitterness of his resentment
on Sully, whom he painted in the darkest colours. Some overtures were
made, to lure the prince back to France, but they were ineffectual.
But, while Henry was preparing to carry war into the territory of his
neighbours, he fell by the hand of an assassin, and the way was thus
opened for the return of the prince.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account