The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
Condé aspired to the regency, but his ambitious hopes were disappointed.
Chagrined at the failure of some of his subsequent schemes, and the
refusal of favours which he sought, the prince, with many of the nobles,
took up arms against the court. For this, he and his adherents were
declared guilty of treason. A peace was, nevertheless, patched up between
the parties, and he returned to Paris in a sort of triumph.
Not more than a year elapsed before the obvious intention of Condé, to
monopolize all the power of the state, compelled Mary of Medicis to
venture upon decisive measures against him. Sully was active in prompting
her to this step. The strength of the prince’s party rendered the
attempt hazardous; but the business was kept so secret, and was so ably
managed, that he was arrested in the Louvre, and conveyed to the Bastile,
without opposition. Here, and at Vincennes, he remained for three years,
during part of which time he was harshly treated. It was not without
much difficulty, and till he had been long confined, that his wife, who
had become sincerely attached to him, was allowed to share his prison.
His liberation was brought about by the fall of Concini, and he was
reinstated in his honours. Thenceforth, he served Louis the thirteenth
faithfully in the cabinet and the field. He died in 1646. Voltaire truly
says, with respect to him, that his being the father of the great Condé,
was his greatest glory.
The downfall of Concini, marshal d’Ancre, which opened the gates of the
Bastile to let out Condé, opened them also to admit, for a short time,
the wife of the murdered marshal. After Concini had been assassinated by
Vitry and his accomplices, and his body had been dragged from the grave,
and torn into fragments, by an ignorant and savage populace, Leonora, his
widow, was hurried to prison. She was a daughter of the female by whom
Mary of Medicis was nursed, and had been the playmate of the princess.
When Mary became the consort of Henry IV., she took Leonora in her train
to Paris. So attached was Mary to her, that Leonora is said, by Mezeray,
“to have directed at her pleasure the desires, the affections, and the
hatreds of the queen.” Riches were, of course, heaped upon her. She is
charged with having fomented the disagreements of Mary and her inconstant
husband, by making false statements, to excite the jealousy of her
mistress. If she did so, which may be doubted, she was performing a work
of supererogation; for Henry rendered falsehood unnecessary, by affording
abundant and undisguised cause for complaint. The light of the sun was
not more obvious than his conjugal infidelity. It was also objected,
that she insolently shut her door against the princesses and nobles, who
came to pay court to her in the height of her power. If this be true,
it proves only that she had spirit and good sense enough to despise
the sycophancy of those by whom she knew herself to be detested. It is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account