The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
Luxembourg remained for fourteen months in the noisome den into which
Louvois had thrown him. The fetid atmosphere which he breathed, the want
of exercise, and the disturbed state of his mind, brought on a fit of
illness, and so much injured his constitution that he never thoroughly
recovered. It must have been no small aggravation of his sufferings, that
he was occasionally drawn forth, to be confronted with the profligate
Lesage, and others of the same class, and to hear them impudently charge
him with the foulest crimes. Lesage maintained, that the duke had entered
into the compact with Satan for the purpose of procuring the death of
Dupin; his accomplices added, that by his order they had murdered her,
cut the body into quarters, and thrown it into the river. Besides this
improbable story, they told another, equally improbable, that he had
given poisoned wine to a brother of Dupin, and to a mistress whom that
brother kept, and had endeavoured to destroy several persons by means of
sorcery. Their depositions may, indeed, contest the palm of absurdity and
falsehood with those of Titus Oates and his perjured associates.
This, however, was not all. It would seem, from their evidence, that
the duke had driven a hard bargain with the prince of darkness, for
they asserted that the compact was designed not only to bring about the
murder of Dupin, but also to obtain the government of a province or a
fortress, and the marriage of his son with the daughter of Louvois. In a
letter to a friend, Luxembourg has left on record his dignified answer
to the last of these stupid calumnies. After treating with ridicule the
idea that he would sell his soul for a government, he says, with respect
to the remainder, “I replied that when the villain (Lesage) told such an
untruth, he did not know that I was of a family which did not purchase
alliances by crimes; that it would have been a great honour to me had
my son married Mdlle. de Louvois, but that I would not have adopted for
the purpose any means which would have subjected me to self-reproach;
and that when Matthew de Montmorenci espoused a queen of France, the
mother of a minor king, he did not give himself to the devil for this
marriage, since the thing was done by a resolution of the States General,
who declared that, to gain for the monarch the services of the lords of
Montmorenci, it was necessary to form this union. It was even out of
delicacy that I used the word _services_, for I believe that, in the
declaration, the word _protection_ is used.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account