The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
The man who acted thus was not likely to be without enemies; all the
greedy, who were disappointed of thrusting their hands into the public
purse, and all the wasteful and corrupt, to whom his example was a
stinging rebuke, would of course abhor him. But Semblançai might have
set their malice at defiance, had they not found an invincible ally in a
female, whose venomous hatred was rendered fatal to him by her unbounded
influence.
This powerful female was Louisa of Savoy, duchess of Angoulême, the
mother of Francis the First. She was beautiful in person, a doating
mother, and endowed with many intellectual qualities of a superior
class; but she was immeasurably ambitious, vindictive, and rapacious.
Such was her avidity for riches, and such her success in gratifying it,
that, at the time of her death, her coffers contained no less than a
million and a half of golden crowns—an enormous, not to say disgraceful
hoard, especially when we consider what was the value of the sum at
that period. In two instances, her criminal passions were the cause of
shame and misfortune to France. Of the first of these we are about to
speak; the second was her persecution of the Constable de Bourbon—a base
and disastrous measure, which was prompted either by resentment for
his rejection of her love, or by her eagerness to seize upon his ample
domains, or, perhaps, by a combination of both these unworthy motives.
The regard which was manifested for Semblançai by Francis was, at one
period, equally felt by the duchess of Angoulême. There exists, under her
hand, the strongest testimony to the rectitude of the superintendant, and
of the generous sacrifices which he made, to provide for the wants of the
state. It was not till the necessity of vindicating his own character
compelled him to criminate her, that she became his enemy.
Jealous of the influence possessed by the countess of Chateaubriant, the
mistress of Francis, whose brother, Lautrec, was then governor of the
Milanese and commander of the French army in that province, the duchess
appears to have formed the plan of aiming a deadly blow at the sister
through the side of the brother. If, by disabling him from defending the
Milanese, she could bring Lautrec into disgrace, it was not improbable
that the disgusted and indignant monarch, who set a high value on his
Italian conquest, would extend his anger to the countess. The means which
she adopted for bringing her scheme to bear, had also an additional and
not trivial merit in her eyes; that of contributing to swell the mass of
treasure which she had already accumulated.
In the first part of her project, she completely succeeded. Deprived of
the pecuniary resources which he had expected from France, and which were
the more needful, as the harshness of his government had rendered him
unpopular in Italy, Lautrec was defeated at the battle of the Bicocco,
was deserted by his Swiss auxiliaries, and at length was driven from the
duchy of Milan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account