The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
The disgrace thus cast upon the French arms, and that, too, in a
country which he in person had won, could not fail to exasperate a
young and warlike sovereign. When Lautrec returned to his native land,
the king refused to admit him to his presence; but at last, through
the intercession of his sister, and of the Constable de Bourbon, the
vanquished general obtained an audience. He was received with a frowning
countenance; and he boldly complained of his reception. “Is it possible
for me,” said Francis, sternly, “to look favourably on a man who is
guilty of having lost my duchy of Milan?”
Nowise daunted by this rebuff, Lautrec firmly replied, “I will dare to
assert, that your majesty is the sole cause of that loss. For eighteen
months your gendarmes had not a single farthing of pay. The Swiss, with
whose disposition as to money you are well acquainted, were also left
unpaid. It was solely by my management that they were retained for
several months with my army. There would have been no reason for wonder
had they quitted it without drawing their swords; their respect for me
induced them, however, not to desert me till after a sanguinary combat.
They compelled me to give battle, though I foresaw clearly that there was
no hope of victory; but, in my circumstances, prudence dictated to risk
every thing, however little chance there might appear that our efforts
would be successful. The whole of my crime amounts to this.”
The astonishment of Francis was excited by this speech of Lautrec.
“What!” exclaimed he, “did you not receive the four hundred thousand
crowns, which I ordered to be sent to you soon after your arrival at
Milan?” “No, Sire,” answered Lautrec; “your majesty’s letters came to
hand, but no money was forwarded to me; nor did it ever pass the Alps.”
Semblançai was immediately summoned into his presence by Francis, to
account for such an extraordinary violation of his duty. In his defence,
the superintendant stated, that the duchess, vested with authority as
regent, had demanded from him the four hundred thousand crowns, and that
he held her receipt for the sum.
Irritated by this unexpected discovery, Francis hastened to his mother’s
apartment, and reproached her for conduct which had cost him a part of
his dominions. The duchess is said to have begun her reply by a denial
of the fact. She was, however, ultimately compelled to own that she had
indeed obtained four hundred thousand crowns from Semblançai; but she
artfully pretended, that she had previously confided the money to his
care, and that it was the produce of savings from her income. Semblançai,
on the contrary, strenuously protested that she had never entrusted any
thing to his keeping, and that, when she drew from him the funds in
question, he had told her that they were set apart by the king for the
service of the forces in Italy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account