The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
Francis was no doubt convinced of her guilt, but he could not bear
the idea of openly stigmatizing a mother whom he loved. There was
consequently nothing to be done but to bury, as far as was possible, the
whole transaction in oblivion. Abruptly putting an end to the altercation
between the duchess and the superintendant, he said, “Let us think no
more on the subject! we did not deserve to conquer; it was in vain that
fortune declared on our side; we threw insuperable obstacles in the way
of her favour. Let us cease to be traitors to each other, and let us
henceforth endeavour to act for the public good, with more wisdom and
union than we have hitherto displayed.”
That Semblançai continued to hold his place is a sufficient proof that
his assertion was credited by the king. That the revengeful duchess was
eager to ruin him, we might easily have believed, even had the result
not afforded evidence of the fact. For a considerable time, however, she
silently nursed her wrath. It was not till 1524, when a new expedition
was in preparation against the Milanese, that she found an opportunity of
striking her blow. Money was wanted; and Semblançai, who had come forward
on former occasions, was desired to make an advance from his private
fortune. But this he declined to do; pleading, as a reason for his
refusal, that a debt of three hundred thousand crowns was already owing
to him. He was punished by dismissal from his office—if that can be
called a punishment for which he appears to have sought—and, after having
given in his accounts, and shown that they were correct, he retired to
his estate of Balan, in the neighbourhood of Tours.
On the departure of Francis for Italy, he again appointed his mother to
act as regent. She had now unlimited power; and, as far as concerned
Semblançai, she exercised it cruelly and basely. She began by instituting
against him a suit, to recover a balance which she alleged to be due
to her, as part of the pretended deposit. To bolster up her cause, she
is accused of having stooped to the most degrading means. Gentil, the
confidential clerk of Semblançai, was enamoured of one of her attendants;
and this female the regent employed to steal, or obtain by blandishments,
the receipt which had been given to the superintendant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account