The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
This arbitrary act was the last which Henry had the power of committing.
On that day fortnight, at a tournament, he was mortally wounded by a
splinter from the lance of the count de Montgomery. The scene of the
tournament was near the Bastile; and it is said that as the wounded
monarch was carried past the prison, his conscience smote him, and he
more than once expressed his fears that he had behaved unjustly to men
who were innocent. The cardinal of Lorraine, who was with him, is also
said to have assured him, that such an idea could have been inspired only
by the arch fiend, and admonished him to reject it, and adhere firmly
to his faith. This story, however, has no other foundation than popular
report.
The reign of Francis II. opened under no favourable auspices for the
protestants. The minor king was wholly under the influence of the
Guises, and of his mother Catherine of Medicis, all of whom had vowed a
deadly hostility to them. The persecution was accordingly resumed with
an increase of vigour. The trial of the members of the parliament was
pushed on; but it was against du Bourg that the hatred of the court was
peculiarly directed—the sweeping crimination, which was contained in his
speech before the deceased Henry, had wounded many great personages too
deeply to be forgiven.
Before the death of Henry, a commission had been appointed, which had
interrogated du Bourg on the subject of his religious tenets. He having
candidly avowed them, they were pronounced heretical by the bishop of
Paris, and he was delivered over to the secular authority. Du Bourg
appealed to the archbishop of Sens, and to the parliament, but without
effect. The trial was proceeded with, and, while it was pending, an event
occurred, which contributed to render his enemies still more inveterate.
One of his judges was a counsellor named Minard, a man of profligate
life, who had given violent advice to the late king. Du Bourg, therefore,
repeatedly challenged him as incompetent to sit upon the trial, and, on
Minard refusing to withdraw, the prisoner is said to have exclaimed, “God
will know how to compel thee!” It unfortunately happened that, returning
one evening to his home from the trial, Minard was assassinated, by
a pistol being fired at him. Du Bourg was suspected, and not without
an appearance of reason, of being implicated in the murder, and this
hastened his fate. There is no ground whatever to believe that he was
concerned in the foul deed; but it must be owned, that such prophecies
as he ventured upon are dangerous, because they have a tendency to bring
about their own fulfilment. It is not improbable, that the act was
suggested to the mind of some fanatical protestant by the words of the
prisoner.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account