The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
Damours was fortunate. Some ferocious wild beasts have been known to
contract an attachment to helpless animals which were thrown into their
dens. Bussi did so with respect to Damours. Instead of tormenting him,
and being eager to send him to the flames, a mode of proceeding which
might have been expected from a zealous and unenlightened catholic,
he took a singular liking for him. With many oaths, he declared that,
thorough hugonot as he was, Damours was worth more than all those
politicians, the presidents and counsellors, “who were nothing but
hypocrites;” and he bestirred himself so vigorously on behalf of his
favourite, that he procured his liberation.
James de la Guesle was born in 1557, and succeeded his father in
the office of attorney general. After the day of the Barricades, he
endeavoured to escape in disguise from Paris, for the purpose of joining
the fugitive king; but he was recognised, and committed to prison. He
did not long remain in the Bastile, and, as soon as he was set free, he
proceeded to St. Cloud, where Henry was residing. The death of the king,
which soon after occurred, afforded the enemies of La Guesle a pretext
to throw out insinuations against him; for it was by him that Clement,
the assassin monk, was introduced into the presence of the monarch.
His loyalty was, however, too well known to admit of being stained by
calumny. After having held office throughout the reign of Henry IV., and
enjoyed the full confidence of that sovereign, La Guesle died in 1612.
The Bastile was not allowed to remain untenanted by prisoners of
distinction. Bussi had soon the gratification of wreaking his hatred
upon “the presidents and counsellors” whom he had described as being
“nothing but hypocrites.” The parliament, still faithful to the king,
was a serious obstacle in the way of the Leaguers, and the Council of
Sixteen determined, therefore, to apply an effectual remedy to this
evil. This remedy was of the same nature as that which, long afterwards,
was employed in England, by Oliver Cromwell, and is known by the name of
Pride’s Purge. Bussi le Clerc was the colonel Pride on this occasion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account