The history of the condition of women, in various ages and nations (vol. 2 of 2) : $b Comprising the women of Europe, America, and South Sea Islands — John Shaqi
The history of the condition of women, in various ages and nations (vol. 2 of 2) : $b Comprising the women of Europe, America, and South Sea IslandsChild, Lydia Maria
History
The history of the condition of women, in various ages and nations (vol. 2 of 2) : $b Comprising the women of Europe, America, and South Sea Islands
Child, Lydia Maria
Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions
“With these resplendent ornaments of gold
Decking my tresses, in this robe arrayed,
Which bright with various tinctured radiance flames,
Not from the house of Peleus or Achilles
A bridal gift, I come. In Sparta this
From Menelaus, my father, I received
With a rich dowry: therefore I may speak
Freely, and thus to you address my words.
Woman! would’st thou, a slave, beneath the spear
A captive, keep possession of this house,
And drive me out?”
Some have supposed that Solon intended to forbid dowries, because
one of his laws declares, “A bride shall not carry with her to her
husband above three garments, and vessels of small value.” But this
was probably intended merely to prevent extravagance in dress and
furniture; for he allowed men who had no sons to leave their estates
to daughters, and express laws were made to secure the property in
the family, by regulating the marriage of heiresses. The daughters of
several Grecian monarchs carried their husbands whole kingdoms for a
dowry. When distinguished men died in poverty, the state sometimes
provided for their children. Thus the Athenians gave three hundred
drachmas to each of the orphan daughters of Aristides, and bestowed
a farm belonging to the city upon the grand-daughter of their famous
patriot, Aristogiton. Phares, of Chalcedon, made a law that rich
men should give a portion to their daughters when they married poor
men, but receive none with their sons’ wives. As luxury increased, it
followed, as an inevitable consequence, that marriages were more and
more made with a view to the acquisition of wealth; and fathers were
disappointed at the birth of a daughter, on account of the expense
attending her establishment. It was customary for the bridegroom
to build and furnish the house, and to make a settlement large in
proportion to her dowry, for the support of his wife in case of death
or divorce; but unless a written receipt of dowry could be produced
by the woman’s friends, the husband could not be compelled to allow a
separate maintenance. Heirs were bound by law to support the wives of
those from whom they received estates.
When sons became of age, they enjoyed their mother’s fortune during her
lifetime, affording her a maintenance in proportion to her rank. If a
woman died without children, her dowry returned to the relative by whom
it had been bestowed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account