The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical HistoryEggleston, George Cary
History
The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical History
Eggleston, George Cary
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
If Patterson had not been sent to the valley at all, but to Washington
instead, the Federal force would have been swelled to 55,000 or 60,000
men, while Beauregard's strength could not have been increased by more
than a few thousands at most. In that case the result of the first
great battle of the war might or might not have been different from
what it was--for with wholly untrained troops strength is not always
to be accurately measured by numbers. But in any case the probability
would have been greatly increased that the first battle of the war
should be the last and that the country by quick and complete victory
should be spared four years of desolating war that threw homes by
scores of thousands into the shadow.
The battle was brought about not in answer to any consideration of
military propriety but solely in response to ignorant but irresistible
popular clamor. The people of this country knew nothing of modern war
or of the conditions that govern success or failure in it. The latest
national recollection of war was of the unequal conflict with Mexico
nearly a decade and a half before. The American people had never seen
assembled in their name and behalf an army half so great as that with
which their patriotism had now responded to the country's call. In
front of Washington and in the near-by valley of Virginia they had
between fifty and sixty thousand men, while their adversaries could
muster there only a little more than half as many.
Knowing little of the difference between uniformed men with arms
in their hands and seasoned soldiers, the people at the North grew
violently impatient of the delay. They had furnished their Government
twice as many armed men as the enemy could count, and they could not
understand why the double force thus created should not go on at once
to make an end of what they regarded as the "nonsense down there in
Virginia."
So confident had been the conviction at the North that this was a petty
outbreak to be suppressed easily and quickly, that a large part of the
enlistments were for no more than three months. That period seemed to
them more than adequate to the task in hand, and it had been deemed
needless to take young men away from their homes and their employments
for a greater length of time.
It is plain enough that the administration at Washington at first
shared this conception of the case. Otherwise it would neither have
called for nor accepted three months volunteers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account