The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical HistoryEggleston, George Cary
History
The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical History
Eggleston, George Cary
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
But the three months were now nearly expired, and nothing had been
done to make an end of the "nonsense." The terms of service of many
regiments were soon to expire and there seemed to be no general
disposition on the part of the men composing them to enter into new
enlistments. It was obvious that unless the "army" at and near
Washington should go forward at once, crush Beauregard's greatly
inferior force, march on to Richmond and make an end of the difficulty,
new levies must be called for and a new strain put upon the endurance
and the patience of the people.
All this impatience found daily and often intemperate expression in
the newspapers, whose rivalry in clamor fanned the flame of discontent
among the people. Desk strategists who knew nothing of war's conditions
had an easy task in figuring out with their blue pencils an absolutely
certain victory for the Federal arms, if only the Federal generals
could be persuaded or compelled by public opinion to avail themselves
of their matchless opportunity. "Are not two more than one? And have
not we the two to our enemy's one? What dullards and laggards our
generals must be to delay for a day or an hour!" So ran the editorial
argument, and that argument seemed to the people conclusive and
convincing, for the reason that the people generally were as ignorant
as the strategists of the editorial rooms themselves concerning the
conditions that govern battle and the training necessary to convert
civilian volunteers into soldiers fit to face a fire of musketry and
cannon.
The military men knew better, of course. Except the superannuated
commander-in-chief, General Scott, not one of them had ever commanded
so much as a brigade in battle, but at least they had been taught in
a military school and many of them had seen fighting. They knew the
peril of hurling ill-organized regiments of utterly untrained and
undisciplined civilians upon the chosen positions of an armed foe,
even when that foe's forces were in a like condition of undisciplined
inefficiency. The arithmetical argument in no degree deceived them.
They knew that with such men as they had under their command strength
could not be safely reckoned by a mere numerical count, that under
certain easily imagined conditions, indeed, strength must often be in
inverse ratio to numbers. They perfectly knew that for them to advance
against the Confederates with an army in such condition as theirs was
at that time was to take a fearful risk of defeat, disastrous and
demoralizing to the army and dangerously discouraging to the country
behind the army.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account