The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical HistoryEggleston, George Cary
History
The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical History
Eggleston, George Cary
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
It was decided to retire. Bowling Green was evacuated and the Federal
General Buell instantly occupied it. A little later Nashville was
evacuated by the Confederates in behalf of a less exposed position.
It was at the same time determined to withdraw from Columbus all the
forces assembled there except a garrison sufficient to work the guns,
and to defend the point for a time with the aid of Commodore Hollins's
gunboats in the Mississippi.
The new line of defense adopted by the Confederates was the Memphis and
Charleston railroad, running through southern Tennessee and northern
Mississippi, Alabama, etc. This line presented no natural advantages
of defense, but it covered the most vitally important railroad
communications of the Confederacy. Furthermore it will be observed
that this line of defense lies almost exactly midway between the Ohio
River and the Gulf of Mexico. In other words, under Grant's energetic
aggressiveness, the Federal control had been pushed from the Ohio river
nearly half way to the gulf. The process of "splitting the Confederacy
in two," was already well advanced at the beginning of the spring of
1862.
It was always the keynote of Grant's policy to "press things," and
after his period of suspension from command he began again to carry out
that obviously wise policy.
As the dominant thought in General Grant's strategy from beginning to
end of the war, he was strongly impressed with the fact that the North
was vastly superior to the South in all military resources, and as a
man of practical common sense it was his idea that this superiority in
men, arms, ammunition, food supplies, and all else that tends to help
military endeavor should be insistently and persistently utilized in
the breaking of Confederate resistance within the briefest possible
time. The ancient thought of divine arbitrament in arms had no place in
his mind. The notion was incredible to him that two armies should stand
still and do nothing while a David on the one side and a Goliath on the
other should make a personal trial of conclusions. He was not lacking
in chivalry or sentiment, as abundantly appeared on several conspicuous
occasions, but he had besides an all-dominating common sense, and he
used it. He fully agreed with the Confederate General Forrest in his
definition of strategy as the art of "getting there first with the most
men." He did not understand modern warfare to be in any wise akin to
a medieval tournament in which equality of opportunity must be sought
at all costs. Quite on the contrary he regarded war as a perfectly
practical matter of business, to be carried on as such. He clearly saw
it to be what it is and always must be, a cruel survival from barbaric
times, a measuring of brute strength in that last appeal of humanity,
to the arbitrament of arms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account