The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical HistoryEggleston, George Cary
History
The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical History
Eggleston, George Cary
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
His common sense taught him that whatever of science there might be
involved in the conduct of war, its results depended after all upon
brute force. It was therefore his plan always to bring to bear all that
he possessed of brute force for the solution of the problems at issue,
and, wherever he could, to press his adversary with heavier battalions
than that adversary could muster.
Having been set free again with permission to resume active warfare,
Grant intuitively desired to push forward, pressing his adversary at
every point, seizing upon every assailable position and making himself
master of every place from which further war could be waged with hope
of success.
As we have seen, he had been called back from this program of common
sense after his capture of Forts Henry and Donelson, and until March
13 he was not again allowed to do anything whatever or to use his
abilities in any manner in the public service.
By making himself master of the two rivers he had completely destroyed
the Confederate line and scheme of defense. He had completely cut
off that part of the Confederate force which had its headquarters at
Bowling Green from that part of it whose chief seat was at Columbus.
So complete was this severance, as a glance at a map will show, that
General Albert Sydney Johnston sent General Beauregard at once to
command the western force as a separate army with specific instructions
to act upon his own judgment, bearing in mind that coöperation between
the two forces was no longer possible.
It was surely a great strategic victory for Grant thus to break an
elaborate line of defense and thus completely to divide an army
already inferior to the armies opposing it in numbers, resources
and equipments. But this was not all of it. By this division of the
Confederate forces Grant was left free to attack either half of the
Southern army at will, with overwhelming numbers--for in addition to
his own 38,000 men--for his force had been swelled to that strength--he
had Buell's much larger force within easy call, to say nothing of
Thomas's command, now foot-loose for aggressive campaigning. It is safe
to say that had Grant been permitted, he could and would have fallen
upon and crushed the Confederates under Johnston, with an absolutely
overwhelming army. He could and would have conquered every remaining
Confederate stronghold in Tennessee and northern Georgia and Alabama
and he could and probably would have made within the first year of the
war that "march to the sea," either at Mobile or at Savannah, which was
left for Sherman to make years later.
On the other hand, with a strong detachment he could easily have
destroyed the long and exceedingly vulnerable line of communication
that connected Columbus, Kentucky, with the South.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account