The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical HistoryEggleston, George Cary
History
The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical History
Eggleston, George Cary
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
Apart from its brilliant incidents which cannot be here related in
detail Jackson's Valley campaign had thus far completely accomplished
its strategic purpose. It had detained Fremont and Schenck with 15,000
men in the mountains when McClellan needed them before Richmond. It
had kept Banks busy and finally had driven him out of the Valley and
into a position from which he could render no assistance to the Federal
armies anywhere. Finally it had so greatly alarmed the authorities at
Washington that they completely diverted McDowell's 40,000 men from
McClellan's reinforcement, sending the major part of that force upon
the fruitless errand of destroying Jackson and employing the rest of it
in the direct defense of Washington.
All this was precisely what Robert E. Lee had planned and intended,
and it was perfectly accomplished. If larger space is here given to
an account of this campaign than the size and direct importance of
its battles would seem to justify, it is because of the tremendous
strategic consequences of the operations involved. Jackson's activity
made possible not only Lee's superb campaign of dislodgment against
McClellan, but all the stupendous campaigning that followed, including
the overthrow of Pope at Manassas, the invasion of Maryland, the battle
of Antietam, the Fredericksburg battle and the later Chancellorsville
and Gettysburg.
The story of all that will follow in later chapters. In the meanwhile,
it is pleasant to record here one step forward in civilization which
was made during this campaign and the author of which, Dr. Hunter
McGuire, deserves remembrance for his humanity. Until that time, and
indeed for long afterwards, surgeons in charge of hospitals full of
wounded men, upon falling into the enemy's hands, were treated as
prisoners of war. After every battle, therefore, the surgeons of a
retiring army, in charge of wounded men from both sides, must make a
hard choice. They must either abandon their patients--many of whom were
in desperate need of immediate surgical attention, or they must submit
themselves to the rigors and sufferings of a military imprisonment,
precisely as if they had been taken in battle. As a result of this
peculiar barbarism of war the wounded--by the flight of their
surgeons--were often left unattended at the critical moment that meant
to them the difference between life and death. Many precious lives were
needlessly sacrificed to this barbaric military practice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account