The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
History
The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)
Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
Crusades
In this extremity, the king of Jerusalem and the principal leaders of
the Christians sent several of their knights to offer the Saracens
battle; but the latter were neither sufficiently imprudent, nor
sufficiently generous to accept a proposal dictated by despair. The
Crusaders were exhausted with hunger and fatigue; the cavalry sunk
into, and encumbered by mud and slime, could neither advance nor
retreat; the foot-soldiers cast away their arms; the baggage of the
army floated away upon the waters, and nothing was heard but groans and
lamentations. “When the Christian warriors,” says an Arabian historian,
“saw nothing before them but death, their minds sank into a state of
despondency, and their backs bent beneath the rod of God, _to whom be
all praise_!”
Pelagius must then have been sensible of the full extent of his error:
his project of marching to Cairo had, doubtless, something great in it,
if it could have been executed; but the presumptuous legate disdained
all counsels, all lessons of experience, and foresaw none of the
obstacles he was certain to meet with on his route; he conducted an
army filled with discontent; the soldiers had neither that confidence
nor that enthusiasm that leads men to brave dangers or cheerfully
encounter fatigue. The king of Jerusalem, the duke of Bavaria, and a
great number of the barons were his personal enemies, and took very
little interest in the success of an enterprise of which they had
disapproved.
Amidst the cries and lamentations of an army to which he had promised
victory, Pelagius was obliged to negotiate for peace, and his pride
humbled itself so far as to implore the clemency of the Saracens.
Christian ambassadors, among whom was the bishop of Ptolemaïs, went
to propose a capitulation to the conquerors; they offered to give up
the city of Damietta, and only asked for the Christian army liberty to
return to Ptolemaïs.
The Mussulman princes assembled in council to deliberate upon the
proposals of the Crusaders. Some were of opinion they should be
accepted; others declared that all the Christians ought to be made
prisoners of war. Among those who proposed the harshest measures, the
sultan of Damascus, an implacable enemy of the Franks, was conspicuous.
“No treaty can be made,” said he, “with warriors without humanity and
without faith. We should remember their barbarities in war and their
treachery in peace. They armed themselves to ravage provinces, to
destroy cities, and overthrow the worship of Mahomet. Since fortune
has placed these most cruel enemies of Islamism, these devastators of
the East, in the hands of _the true believers_, we ought to immolate
them to the safety of the Mussulman nations, and take an advantage of
our victory that will create a terror among the people of the West for
ever.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account